• BEYOUBlåhaj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Based om my experience with android but surely any mainstream smartphone works a bit like this.

      That isn’t up to the website necessarily. Every app states what links it supports to your phone, that will open the appropriate app automatically. On android you can change this behaviour on a per link per app basis in settings>apps>app-name>"open by default"

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 minutes ago

        Even if that is how it’s working, it’s up to the website to send that command. The app isn’t looking at the URL you enter. That’s why you can force the browser to go to the desktop version of the site to actually get it to load. The URL is the same. In any case, the company controls the app and the website. It’s on them for how it works.

        And even if you prevent it from loading the app, there’s probably still not going to be a website to load.

        It’s annoying because it’s the default functionality, not that there is no way to get a website to load.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        I fucking hate this functionality. Thankfully browsers let you disable it, even on iOS

  • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Reddit is doing this to their site. Sucks when you get there from Google only to have an ad popup for their app and it breaks the page and can’t be removed

    • aloofPenguin@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I haven’t visited them on mobile as of late, but you could always click ‘continue’ on the chrome button and continue? unless this is an actual ad that ad blockers block

      • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s now a full ad like banner on the bottom of the screen that blocks most of the text and prevents anything, no option to close / hide it either. Just use the app or leave

      • deft@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Not anymore. It’ll sorta just lock you out. The only solution is to view the site in the old way

  • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I fucking hate that. Used to have Revolut but stopped using it. They been annoying me with constant emails if I won’t update my data so I went and tried deleting my account. DELETING IS ONLY AVAILABLE THROGUH AN APP. TO LOGIN YOU NEED TO PROOF TPUR IDENTITY.

    The comes research with the findings that, as stated in TOS, it is possible to delete an account though emailing them directly. After like 30 emails between us they did delete it. Most of their replies were telling me I can only delete my account in app. Fuck Revolut.

  • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Then you get the app and it’s just a browser and a skin for there website.

    • Jako302@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Banks are the one thing that should use apps. Browsers have too many security issues.

      The bigger issue is them using the google integrity bullshit, that’s not necessary.

    • bitfucker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Until web standard can agree to have device bound session, it won’t happen. Cookie stealer malware is just too dangerous to perform financial transaction. So maybe for read only stuff it is fine

  • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Just today, my health insurance told me i had to install their app to schedule a specialist visit. After installing it and logging in, I tapped the “specialists” button, and it proceeded to switch out of the app to my browser and connect to their mobile website.

    ETA: as a cherry on top, these instructions were on their website, which I was looking at on my desktop. I had to switch to my phone first.

    • nagaram@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You don’t understand. Phone screens are a lot smaller so you need less code to run them.

      Have you even considered how greedy you are wanting to use up so many tokens?

      /s

      • Winter_Oven@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Imagining someone generating the HTML, CSS and JS on the fly using Claude is killing me

        No need for any of that PHP or Jinja or HTMX shite /s

  • molten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Got an amber alert the other day. It linked to twitter to see more info including pics of the victim. I don’t have an account and couldn’t view it on mobile without jumping through a bunch of hoops. Wonder how much less effective it makes those alerts that you have to have an acct to see who was fucking kidnapped.

    • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The amount of news sites where they post Twitter comments on there stories but you need a sign in to view. What’s the point of a public announcement service if you can’t find out without handing a company your information.

  • riskiedingo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I miss when UI was designed to streamline the user experience. Nowadays it makes it so hostile that you want their app in order to be able to interact with the service.

    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I want a new browser than completely “reskins” the most important websites. There is Reader View on firefox which I wish would be a bit more expanded and flexible. And maybe something like web archive but it only P2P shares the simplified reader view of articles and pages. For that simpler AI models could be very useful.

      If there was just one country on earth that would say no to intellectual property laws. You could put a central repository server there and mirror most of the internet and make it accessible again. I’d gladly pay a few bucks a month for that. Maybe combine it with a VPN.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      16 hours ago

      But the app UX is even worse. It just gives you access to more functionality.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It gives them more access, makes them better able to invade your privacy and snoop around in your phone.

        Plus, they want their icon on your phone’s home screen so you’ll remember them again next time.

  • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    7 minutes ago

    Okay, I know I know that 99.9% of humans own a mobile phone, and the percentage that own a computer is much lower, but I’ve always hated how websites (first noticed with Google Search and Facebook) stopped caring about rendering for desktops and just utilised 30% of the screen width. Half the internet is a skinny portrait mode on a landscape screen and has been for ages

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Fucking Instagram and their Web interface. Try to get the maximum video size on a horizontal screen. Bonus points when a horizontal video is uploaded to their vertical frame optimised viewer.

      I did the math before: it was literally less than 1% of my screen. There’s no full screen feature.

      Not like it cost them even a measurable amount of money to have one developed. They keep it awful intentionally to get you to install the app. Fuck companies like that.

    • Lojcs@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Pretty sure narrow text width has been a thing for ages, even before smartphones. Unless you mean a newer, narrower style I guess. It’s easier to read when you can see both ends of a line at the same time so even letters are written on portrait paper.

      And I’m not a web developer, but if I had to guess styling a page to limit the text width on a wide screen probably takes more effort, not less.

      • zerofk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        15 hours ago

        On desktop you can change window sizes to what you want. Don’t like wide text? Use part of the screen. But the inverse is not true: if a site decides to stay skinny you can’t make it wide if that’s what you prefer.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        This is why I miss square screens. And I miss proper UI/UX design which makes good use of screen real estate.

        • EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Omg, same, so same. But putting anything I need to read (like… anything in a browser usually) in a smaller window is fine. Librewolf letterboxing kinda does it for me.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        If you don’t want to change the window size for whatever reason, I find that reader mode (F9) solves this problem pretty well.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      So the 30 characters wide texts are a thing? And here i always thought that was a issue with one of my userstyles.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Maybe if we add some AI? All AI? AI in AI? Hold on, stay! C’mon! We’re only going to try to figure out how much you make so we can steal your money by giving you some shit products in return! And AI will take your job…hey come back! C’mon!

    • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Some people are starting to get worn out by AI being pushed so aggressively and we need a way to make them interested again, so, hear me out:

      AI powered AI

      No more prompt engineering, you can just ask an AI to prompt an AI in an Agentic™ way and the AI will summarize the responses from the AI!