Want to wade into the rainbow-ridden surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • nfultz@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    https://www.linkedin.com/posts/coquinn_saw-a-guy-watering-his-lawn-this-morning-share-7469886051847766016-rhHD/

    Saw a guy watering his lawn this morning. Just standing there, hose in hand, dumping potable water onto grass that exists for no reason other than to be looked at and complained about.

    Sir. Do you understand that a single hyperscale data center can drink millions of gallons a year keeping GPUs from cooking themselves while they generate a poem about a sad robot? That water has a HIGHER calling. That water could be evaporating off a cooling tower in service of someone’s RAG pipeline that returns the wrong answer with tremendous confidence.

    And here you are. Hydrating Kentucky bluegrass. In a region where the grass was never supposed to grow in the first place.

    I asked him if his lawn had an SLA. He said no. I asked what his lawn’s uptime commitment was. He looked at me like I was the unreasonable one. Meanwhile that turf is sitting at four nines of being green and producing exactly zero tokens per second.

    We are pouring concrete across three states to host inference workloads, and this man is allocating municipal water to a crabgrass cluster with no monetization strategy. No usage-based billing. Not even a freemium tier.

    Anyway I reported him to nobody, because there’s no one to report him to, which is honestly the most damning part of this entire ecosystem.

    Touch grass, they said. He did. Look where it got us.

    NOT EVEN A FREEMIUM TIER. that got me.

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      this man is allocating municipal water to a crabgrass cluster with no monetization strategy

      This is poetry, AI could never

  • samvines@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The new Claude model will silently decide whether what you asked it to do is in line with anthropic ToS and silently corrupt your prompt if it doesn’t like what you’re asking. It’s couched as a “safety countermeasure” but it is presumably to stop Chinese labs trying to scrape synthetic data.

    We’ve moved from ‘accidental’ hallucinations to deliberate misinformation and you’re paying $$$ for the privelige.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Claude can now be silently nerfed. Anthropic has decided it won’t tell users when this happens.

      considering how many habitual llm users can’t tell good from bad output anyway, they always could have done that

    • FredFig@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      To what extent should one trust a statement that a program is free of Trojan horses? Perhaps it is more important to trust the people who wrote the software.

      Ken Thompson, Reflections on Trusting Trust

      I know this outcome was inevitable after software became a mass market thing, but it’s still rather depressing.

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Wake up babe new genre definition just dropped

    https://stoates.substack.com/p/programmer-science-fiction

    Includes all the usual suspects, but notably doesn’t mention Ken MacLeod whose Fall Revolution series is probably too socialist[1]. Also avoids discussing Stross post-Singularity Sky.


    [1] MacLeod’s Corporation Wars trilogy has immersive VR, artificial conciousness rebelling against authority, and literal p-zombies but is also very anti-fascist, so no wonder it’s not mentioned (also, it’s unfortunately not very good)

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Viral: “read a second book”

      Spiral: “read a second Borges story”

      The author of “Death and the Compass” and “Emma Zunz” is unrecognizable from the description there.

    • Charlie Stross@wandering.shop
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      @gerikson @techtakes Technical nit-pick: “American hard science fiction space opera like Timelike Infinity is also influential”— Timelike Infinity was written by Steven Baxter who is *very* English indeed. Best contextualized as mid-period Interzone generation hitting its imperial phase.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Lol what a weak argument. Not only does this limit your llm use to only bugfixing (which is what the op is limiting their use to right?), it also ignores how a few big recent outages were prob caused by llms. And it treats ethical concerns like some sort of numbers game. We have one ethical concern for and one against so it cancels out.

      And it leads to ‘Mengeles experiments were not unethical because some of the torture he did actually provided valuable insights on the extremes a human body can go through’

  • blakestacey@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    The most pedantic nerds on Earth (complimentary) have discovered that Grok leaks its prompts when slopping out Grokipedia pages. Examples:

    • "The instructions say “You are an agent that writes the various article sections for an encyclopedia entry on Joseph Kanuku.”

    • “[Note: Britannica is encyclopedia, but instructions say no Britannica. Wait, replace with another.]”

    • “Wait, instructions say NEVER cite Wikipedia. Oops. Let me adjust.”

    • “The instructions say prioritize peer reviewed, books, etc.”

    • “Wait, but instructions say never cite social media, so omit that last part. Wait, adjust. Since Instagram is social media, omit that.”

    • “Wait, instructions say avoid “References” as a section, but for completeness, I’ve omitted it from structure.)”

    • “The guidelines say “Include any of the following where relevant: - Factual details…” under Missing Information or Knowledge Gaps Examples. And in format, it’s to list only critical issues or all missing info or knowledge gaps.”

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I guess a certain country is using LLMs to try to engage people 1:1 to change their opinions of said country.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Good point. Now I imagine someone trying to pass the turing test by having their bot pretend to be a sales person.

  • fiat_lux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    3 weeks after the “as soon as Friday” news, OpenAI has followed Anthropic and confidentiality filed their draft S-1. But they sure don’t sound confident about it. Whole post in full (sans legal fine print):

    We recently submitted a confidential S-1. We expect it to leak so we’re just announcing it. We have not decided on timing yet; it may be a while because there are things we want to do that are likely easier as a private company. But it’s a complicated set of tradeoffs and this gives us the option to go public sooner if that ends up being best.

    May, likely, if… Those are some weight-bearing subjunctive clauses.

    Edit: also Altman’s eyeball tracker company is doing layoffs now

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t they have their CFO not even reporting directly to be CEO? I would bet that there’s a ton of internal dissent about timing and strategy of how to cash out.

      • fiat_lux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        That CFO thing was definitely the case, at least a few months ago. I’m sure you’re right about the internal chaos, even if that CFO drama has changed, and it would align with how non-committal this announcement is.

        I would love to be a fly on that wall.

      • o7___o7@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ed Zitron might have got hold of it, if his bsky is anything to go by.

        We could be feasting soon!

      • TinyTimmyTokyo@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        IANAL, but my understanding is that companies are allowed to keep confidential the fact that they even filed the S-1. That’s how I read OpenAI’s statement. But it’s not completely clear what “it” means in “we expect it to leak”.

      • fiat_lux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Draft filings involve feedback from the SEC, so I think they may be throwing shade on government employees, whom they can’t fire or control directly.

        But I’m also thinking they may be salty about the aforementioned “as soon as Friday” articles, and then Anthropic beating them to filing.

        Hard to tell how much of it is what, they’re toxic inside and out.

  • macroplastic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    Molly White continuing to slam it out of the park with a pivot to AI. As always, worth a read in full, but this intro bit stuck out to me after reading lots of inane blather on how crypto and AI are different:

    Continuing to track only crypto would mean missing half the story. The same operatives are running both campaigns. Josh Vlasto, longtime adviser and spokesperson for Fairshake — the cryptocurrency super PAC network responsible for the bulk of crypto’s 2024 spending — is now simultaneously heading Leading the Future, a pro-AI super PAC network. Chris Lehane, the political consultant and Coinbase board member who helped establish Fairshake and famously told Coinbase employees who questioned whether a crypto voter bloc existed that they would simply invent one, is now also an OpenAI executive and one of the people behind the Leading the Future PAC network. The same venture capital firms are funding both: Andreessen Horowitz, a crypto heavyweight in the 2024 elections, is now splitting its political spending across crypto and AI PACs.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    Coworker got fired because he used AI to plan for a site installment of our product. The AI made a very nice looking plan but it failed to include enough packing material so nearly half of the units arrived broken. Boss still thinks AI is going to revolutionize work for the better though.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Came across this today: the purpose of a system is what it does. Based on that I would say the purpose of Claude was to make mistakes and get my coworker fired.

    • BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      to be fair, the plan would have worked if you had included the allotted number of goblins in the box in addition to the packing material.