

Gwern apparently hates slop for text but loves it for pictures.


Gwern apparently hates slop for text but loves it for pictures.


"The instructions say “You are an agent that writes the various article sections for an encyclopedia entry on Joseph Kanuku.”
“[Note: Britannica is encyclopedia, but instructions say no Britannica. Wait, replace with another.]”
“Wait, instructions say NEVER cite Wikipedia. Oops. Let me adjust.”
“The instructions say prioritize peer reviewed, books, etc.”
“Wait, but instructions say never cite social media, so omit that last part. Wait, adjust. Since Instagram is social media, omit that.”
“Wait, instructions say avoid “References” as a section, but for completeness, I’ve omitted it from structure.)”
“The guidelines say “Include any of the following where relevant: - Factual details…” under Missing Information or Knowledge Gaps Examples. And in format, it’s to list only critical issues or all missing info or knowledge gaps.”


They want to invent the AI Named For Untruth from the hit Star Trek: The Next Generation episode “Do Not Invent the AI Named for Untruth”.


Isn’t that the hat from the picture that Yudkowsky showed off to prove he wasn’t a cult leader? Are they trying to beat the cult allegations by ha ha jokingly wearing the same silly clothes as their founder?


Please enjoy this comment saying “Nate Silver is a major proponent of AI assisted writing” like that’s a good thing, and the reply that argues against slop from the weird premise that enjoying one’s own writing process is bad.


owning us with hats and logic


A lolsob moment:
When the CEO was questioned about “when the $5 Uber rides” end w/r/t token usage, he was confused at the notion the shit was even subsidized.
https://bsky.app/profile/apcarnist.bsky.social/post/3mnq3btjmfc2u


Is our children learning?!
“Failing grades soar as professors see greater AI usage, dwindling math skills in UC Berkeley computer science classes”


Wikipedia is mirrored all over the place for good purposes and for ill. Old articles are probably floating around out there, and who knows if the slop machine can distinguish what Wikipedia itself says from other pages that have “from Wikipedia” stamped on them?


From the comments:
If there is room for a coliving or cohousing intentional community with maker and permaculture components alongside your plan, I would love to discuss the possibility of collaborating.
“Love your idea, but could we make it more like a compound?”


I think there even is a case to be made about how Frank Herbert is the anti-L. Ron Hubbard, using sci-fi literature as an efficient outlet for his psychedelics/mysticism/ecology/psychosexuality obsession oscilliation and actually leaving a descent literary legacy instead of starting a cult or several, but this post is already running so long it’s starting to need an editor.
I would read that essay.


Malkovich?
Malkovich Malkovich!


Honestly, I almost brought the banhammer down for this. Making excuses for shitty programmer behavior is bad. Doing it by pretending they’re like victims of domestic abuse is worse.


And you don’t get to complain about me spending my free time banning you. Bye!


The truly fundamental aspect of the entire philosophy, in practice, was telling people “Just fork it, then.”


“When help never arrived, he actively chose to make everyone else’s life worse.”
As Yoda would say, a fucking river cry me.


“I personally worry that the EA community has over-learned the lessons of FTX”
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/95NgkvZKJx8tJbtn5/lighthaven-east-a-feasibility-study


The take I usually see on The Art of War nowadays is that it’s full of dunderheadedly obvious advice because it’s written for men who have inherited an army, or in modern parlance, nepo baby failsons.


Damn. That sucks.
Viral: “read a second book”
Spiral: “read a second Borges story”
The author of “Death and the Compass” and “Emma Zunz” is unrecognizable from the description there.