“I think what a CEO does is maybe one of the easier things maybe for an AI to do one day,” he said. Although he didn’t talk specifically about CEO functions that an AI could do better, Pichai noted the tech will eliminate some jobs but also “evolve and transition” others—ramifications that mean “people will need to adapt.”
Pichai’s comments come as other tech CEOs have also predicted the coming of a new era of chief executive automations. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman previously said AI will someday do his job better than him, adding, “I will be nothing but enthusiastic the day that happens.” Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of buy-now-pay-later firm Klarna, also said in a post on X earlier this year that “AI is capable of doing all our jobs, my own included.”
So I’ve already commented on this post, but I’ve had another thought: imagine if your CEO sent you an email saying “we need to do X”. You respond with “no, X causes this issue, we need to do Y” and your CEO responds with “You’re absolutely right! Here’s how we will implement this new policy”
How is an AI chatbot going to eat a business lunch?
One byte at a time?
A computer can never be held accountable, so a computer should never hold a management position.
Also, Sundar Pichai is a dick.
Not being held accountable is the main tenant of modern CEOs
They are incredibly sorry all the time though.
Which LLMs can already do very well.
Yea I’m not seeing any real difference. Something that plagurisng and takes credit for what others achieved and also isn’t held accountable for anything.
plagurisngplagiarizingWhat happened there lol
Was on the toilet
Yeah, I see this as the real problem. Companies will use AI CEOs to take the blame when it makes bad decisions, whether it be to investors or in court. I hope we get to see an AI CEO testify in court.
I would love to see a whole AI data-centre and its accompanying nuclear power plant get arrested.
I’m no fan of CEOs but I don’t really want AI in charge of stuff either
They are both psychopaths, you’d be hard pressed to find a difference.
They both see workers as a numbers and expendable.
So… that means they’ll all step down and stop getting paid millions per year, right?
Right?
Guys? Right?
No?
…
😐
As much as I like hating CEO’s… Aren’t small company CEO’s included? I feel that at least some of those people risked it all to build a company so they really shouldn’t be bundled in here…
Collectives are better. Share risk, responsibility, and reward.
If that happens I HOPE we can Use our TAX DOLLARS to make Sure CEOS can Continue their Extravagant Lifestyle!
I’m sure there are many jobs AI is not capable of doing but some CEOs probably do a bad enough job that an AI chat bot could probably do better.
I know we like to dump on CEOs all the time but a good CEO does not seem like one that could be replaced by AI, certainly not by what is currently being hyped. There are just a lot of highly visible companies with CEOs who aren’t actually very good. I suspect the dysfunction of publicly traded companies and the goals of Wall Street investors (or other nations’ equivalents) frequently not aligning with a good long-term health of a company has a strong influence on this.
And of course these guys will be happy to have AI replace them; they’ve already made boatloads of money and think they’ll be able to keep that going even if they lose their job.
Being a good CEO is 95% about social networking; creating and maintaining trustworthy relationships with others who will provide you with good support. AI can’t do this, as it’s a truly human thing.
Let’s run the job requirements list:
- amoral
- talks a lot about things they don’t understand
- comfortable with lying if it benefits their goals
- emotionless psychpathic traits
- uses enormous amount of resources for questinable gains
- good at manipulation
- bad at maths
- occasional racist outbursts on social media
Yeah all seems to check out. Replace the CEOs, AI can’t do worse.
Nailed it.
Something that consistently makes bad choices with little more than random probability? You don’t say
CEO’s job is to make business connections and get funding or contracts and stuff. People skills. LLM is really good at manipulation… If you give LLM a physical body, I would say it’s not that far-fetched…
AI can be such a good kiss ass, think of all the emotional suffering it’ll save existing CEOs from having to endure kissing ass of people they hate.
Do it!
AI is advancing so swiftly, he said, that over the next 12 months the tech will be able to perform “complex” tasks and act as an agent on a users’ behalf.
I must be having the same deja vu for a hundredth time. What a clown.
You don’t even need AI. Just pay staff less and charge customers more, and give the stolen money to shareholders. Ta-da! That’s the CEO’s job done.
Become the shareholder and pay yourself ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
Haha I like that emote
Because upper management is less checked, they make a lot of human choices, such as keeping a lot of bullshit job positions open as garden hermits (there for scenery, to look busy).
AI tasked with actually increasing profits may run the business better than their human counterparts.
Hype up vaporware. Be unprofitable but keep on hyping to draw in investors and inflate stocks and give yourself an inflated salary and sell off stocks periodically.
If get lucky enough vaporware eventually becomes a viable company or it goes bankrupt but its fine you already cashed out along the way. Yay.
Yes, it can. Research even indicates it can. He isn’t saying anything actually novel.
Research in question: https://hbr.org/2024/09/ai-can-mostly-outperform-human-ceos
