• Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    “Should”

    The USA left “should” in about 1950. There is no “should” here.

    Workers were abandoned by the Democrats long ago. Union membership is now less than 10% (and most of that is government employees, ironically)… it was almost 50% back in the “good old days”.

    There is no labor party in the USA, there is no anti-war party, there is no anti-billionaire party. There should be. But there’s not.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    sanders has finally lost it if ai comes for workers, those workers wont even have a week to work with

  • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I hate how people are so used to getting ripped off that they hear “four day work week” and assume that it’s going to be 4-10’s.

    Like this is Bernie. He’s not perfect, but he gets this type of shit right. Obviously he’s advocating a 32 hour, 4-day work week. It says so in the article that apparently no one read. But people are just so inured to everything getting worse all the time. Damn.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I also think companies should start paying for commute times, and that the time paid should be adjusted based on the cost of living in the area and the salary.

      Of someone chooses to live 3 hours away when they could live in walking distance, that’s one thing. But I work for a municipality in a prohibitively expensive area. 0 city employees live in the city they work and literally 100% of households are multi-millionaires or better. I have a 90-120 minute commute depending on traffic because that’s where I can afford to live on my salary, but it also means I’m essentially working 3-4 hours extra a day.

      Of course the city isn’t gonna pay me 50% again more money, but if they were required to pay for my commute time they’d suddenly agree that I only really need to be in the office about once a week for public meetings since mostly what I do is Teams meetings, plan review, phone calls and emails, which could be done just as easily from my home office as at City Hall.

      Shit - I get more done remote because I don’t have to deal with people walking in without an appointment and demanding a meeting.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    I mean if it can do it all it should be technically a zero day workweek but we know that is not true. Honestly there should always be humans in the loop.

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Oh, a 4 day work week will come, with 4 hours of work per day (after an hour commute), to avoid paying you benefits. You’ll need 2 or three of those jobs to pay rent along with your roommates.

  • seasidechapel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I used to travel regularly to Germany, spains and France, for instance work on production sites and equipment there. The standard legal working week currently in France is 35 hours. Currently data shows on average US workers work 34 hours a week. To be honest, it’s not that far off from the 32 hours Sanders is suggesting in his legislation he is coauthoring

    • tmyakal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You’re missing an important distinction, though: in the US, health benefits are tied to full-time employment, and most places consider anything under 35 to be part-time. I’ve had several jobs that would force me to clock off if I was at risk of hitting that full-time threshold. I had times where I was struggling to make ends meet, but they wouldn’t let me work more. And, at least in my state, if you take on a second job, wages from the second job are taxed at a higher rate.

      So 34 American hours and the benefits associated are very different from 35 French hours. Codifying the threshold for full-time employment at 32 hours instead will only benefit white collar workers. Everyone else will just get their hours cut even further and be driven further into poverty.

      Basically, we really, really need to fix American healthcare before anything else, because until we’re on a single-payer system, most changes to labor law will fuck the most at-risk populations.

    • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Denmark made the 32-hour workweek standard and their GDP went up. The fact that other countries aren’t following suit is proof that the capitalists don’t even follow their own statistical models.

      • twig@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Uh, no we didn’t. I wish we did, though.
        Every once in a while, some politician brings it up, but 37 hours is still the default.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The issue is that you have to work 38 to 40 hours a week to get full time benefits, so most Americans aren’t getting healthcare or vacation days at that level of employment, as they are considered “part time workers.”

  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “sorry, best we can do is 2 shit jobs 7 days a week. AI took all the good ones and we’re not sharing a fucking thing with you”

    • billionaire scum
  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I already work a 4 day work week. 4/10’s. I get up at 3 am. I fight traffic on the way home which doubles or triples my commute time home. It’s not all it’s cracked up to be.

    I think 4/10’s is already doable in a lot of industries but I question why they expect it to continue to be a 40 hour work week, or expect us to be paid more money for less hours. Nothing has trended that way in the entire time I’ve been alive. Feels like a pipedream.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I appreciate that he’s trying, but Bernie is so out of his depth when it comes to AI.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I honestly probably only actually do three days worth of actual productive work a week, the other two days are spent in meetings which are necessary because management like to change procedures on a bi monthly basis, just to show everyone how in charge they are.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    12 hours ago

    4 day work week would be already possible if we didn’t use a sizable amount of our industry production to just make useless crap. It would be 3 days, if we abolished planned obsolescence and made thing repairable.

    • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      According to Bullshit Jobs it would be less than half the working hours if we just stopped doing those

    • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      UBI without price control is useless. Rent is just going to go up by that amount and same for utilities, food, etc.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That would be a profound lack of imagination on companies. Raising prices to cover costs make sense since all businesses will be affected in the same way equally, but to just do it because everyone has more money doesn’t, your competitor might just undercut you by keeping their prices the same, and then get all the profit.

        • coolman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          That assumes that everything isn’t either owned by monopolies, trusts, or even just companies all agreeing to hike prices

        • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Lol.

          Have you seen how the real economy works? It works by creating monopolies, fixing prices, lobbying for public contracts and subsidies and moving everything into private equity.

          Do you think landowners won’t leech every cent they can get away with?