• SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    he nation built on slavery and genocide, that fomented 99% of the coups and dictatorships of the 20th century… started “failing” around Reagan’s time

    Truly though, I thought they were making a connection between a nation built on slavery and genocide, fomenting much of the coups and dictatorships of the 20th century and recent failures. I thought they were just pointing out that there’s a pattern, and that it’s rooted in our country’s history.

        • grinning_serpent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yes. If being evil was what defined whether a nation was failing, I’m pretty sure the world would have nothing but failed states.

          How can you possibly believe that morality has anything to do with whether or not a state is stable?

          • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I guess it hinges on whether you think a “successful” state is one that is life giving versus just “stable”. I’m not saying morality has to do with stability, but rather what (to me) is the sign of a successful state of affairs. Evil doesn’t fit in to my idea of success.

            • grinning_serpent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              I don’t disagree, but it’s hard to think of many states that are still around today that haven’t done evil shit. If you’re against the idea of uneven trade and exploitation of developing countries, it’s probably not impossible to find a moral state.