“The new device is built from arrays of resistive random-access memory (RRAM) cells… The team was able to combine the speed of analog computation with the accuracy normally associated with digital processing. Crucially, the chip was manufactured using a commercial production process, meaning it could potentially be mass-produced.”

Article is based on this paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-025-01477-0

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It uses 1% of the energy but is still 1000x faster than our current fastest cards? Yea, I’m calling bullshit. It’s either a one off, bullshit, or the next industrial revolution.

    EDIT: Also, why do articles insist on using ##x less? You can just say it uses 1% of the energy. It’s so much easier to understand.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean it‘s like the 10th time I‘m reading about THE breakthrough in Chinese chip production on Lemmy so lets just say I‘m not holding my breath LoL.

      • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        As someone with a 401k I really hope it isn’t.

        The economy crashing won’t hurt billionaires but will kill the middle class.

        If anything the economy crashing will allow the 0.1% to buy up anything they haven’t gotten already.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Look, It’s one of those articles again. The bi-monthly “China invents earth-shattering technology breakthrough that we never hear about again.”

    “1000x faster?” Learn to lie better. Real technological improvements are almost always incremental, like “10-20% faster, bigger, stronger.” Not 1000 freaking times faster. You lie like a child. Or like Trump.

    • jali67@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because until it hits market, it’s almost meaningless. These journalists do the same shit with drugs in trials or early research.