Hackers use LLMs to spot odd exploits so it makes sense developers use them too. The usage of LLMs in development likely won‘t make Linux better or safer overall, because bugs and exploits wouldn‘t have been found by either side without it in the first place. It‘s like pandora‘s box where Linus is kind of forced to use it. If that makes sense.

The biggest problem with Starlink is that most people who have it should really have access to fiber. Starlink just really exposes the shortcomings of our terribly handled infrastructure. Of course satellite internet servers other purposes too but it really annoys me how otherwise fairly developed places have so shitty internet that they need freaking satellite to get a more reliable connection. It would be far cheaper for everyone to just massively expand fiber like everywhere in the European Union for example.

Of course there are also the SpaceX launch sites that devastate communities and environments in ways that are absolutely unacceptable but I digress.

So they say ads will not be personalized but based on your prompt. How is that not the epitome of personalization??? Once again AI company people are too high on designer drugs to lie convincingly.

They would probably get sued if they dropped names of direct competitors.

Mind you this is about the currently heavily used machine learning architecture and not even LLMs which are another product of this architecture and have even less potential in my opinion.

Machine learning is a useful tool for research but it‘s just a tool that needs to be handled by competent people.

I‘m mean we‘re seeing what happens when you let AI loose on incompetent individuals.

I betcha if they set them up in his rich people neighborhood they wouldn‘t last for 2 days because someone with more money than him made a phone call.

They funded his campaign. Serves them right.

Forget about rights as a whole for us plebs.

Remember, the whole AI scheme exists to take the very concept of ownership from us. This takeover is hostile.

Nice to finally meet you, Orexin. I think I never had the pleasure.

Also so they can sell everyone‘s data. Preferably to governments.

The opt-out is new but the platform definitely trained models on stream footage for years before telling anyone or giving them a way to opt-out.

I doubt someone does all that alone. Looks more like a semi-professional group to me.

I‘m more upset about the union busting than their anti-consumer practices but that‘s mostly because I have no interest in buying it. Either way it‘s an insane demand for a company to make. How about just let authorities handle it like everyone else would?

A rather expensive if not straight up damaging ad campaign if we look at Rockstar‘s lukewarm stock. The crypto angle doesn‘t add up either.

Well I know what kind of propaganda a tanky like you is gobbling up if you paint an inhumane, totalitarian regime that knows no human rights like some kind of intellectual utopia. If they manage to „develop their own“ anyway we both know it will be done with industrial espionage and not innovation.

EA is loaded with so much debt I doubt it will even matter. They‘ll be dismantled.

Why do you want them to sell to China so desperately? It has done nothing but irreversible damage to countries to sell key industries to China. Look at Germany‘s history of solar power and industry robots that China bought and now mass produces instead. Germany could‘ve been a key player in this if the industry and politics played their cards right.

Political censorship is definitely worse so I‘m not going to bother.

Roblox really seems to be the end boss of evil game companies. The competition is certainly steep but they never cease to amaze me with how low they‘re willing to go for a few bucks more.