LegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-216 days agoDo you like (AI) clocks?clocks.brianmoore.comexternal-linkmessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10
arrow-up17arrow-down1external-linkDo you like (AI) clocks?clocks.brianmoore.comLegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-216 days agomessage-square13linkfedilink
minus-square[object Object]@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-214 days agoI dig the square clock, and am now sad that the numbers can’t be put into the corners on a real clock. Unless they’re shifted from the usual position.
minus-squarehuppakee@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-214 days agoCartier found a work around quite some time ago and maybe they weren’t even the first to design a square ‘clock’: (The roman numerals are nice, but notice the ‘circle’ between the numerals and the hands, almost like the circle from the ai)
minus-square[object Object]@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-214 days agoThat one is pretty good, though the Roman numerals are rather busy and uneven. This one is closer, though now I have to wonder if all non-square rectangular clocks have an old-timey whiff for me, or it’s just the border here: This is also impressive:
I dig the square clock, and am now sad that the numbers can’t be put into the corners on a real clock. Unless they’re shifted from the usual position.
Cartier found a work around quite some time ago and maybe they weren’t even the first to design a square ‘clock’:
(The roman numerals are nice, but notice the ‘circle’ between the numerals and the hands, almost like the circle from the ai)
That one is pretty good, though the Roman numerals are rather busy and uneven.
This one is closer, though now I have to wonder if all non-square rectangular clocks have an old-timey whiff for me, or it’s just the border here:
This is also impressive: