- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.zip
- technology@lemmit.online
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.zip
- technology@lemmit.online
Exclusive: Sarah Wynn-Williams faces $50,000 fine every time she breaches order banning her from criticising Meta
A former Meta executive who wrote an explosive exposé making allegations about the social media company’s dealings with China and its treatment of teenagers is said to be “on the verge of bankruptcy” after publishing the book.
An MP has claimed in parliament that Mark Zuckerberg’s company was trying to “silence and punish” Sarah Wynn-Williams, the former director of global public policy at Meta’s precursor, Facebook, after her decision to speak out about her time at the company.
Louise Haigh, the former Labour transport secretary, said Wynn-Williams was facing a fine of $50,000 (£37,000) every time she breached an order secured by Meta preventing her from talking disparagingly about the company.
If you ever want to know who rules you, look at who you aren’t allowed to criticize.
My wife. X__x
This quote is commonly attributed to Voltaire but it’s an anti-Semitic dog whistle coined by neo-Nazi Kevin Alfred Strom.
Thanks for posting that, I was about to! Molly Conger did a great episode of Weird Little Guys about this exact subject called Do We Really Need to Talk About Kevin?
I knew those god damn disabled, 4th stage cancer suffering orphans were secretly in charge
Regardless of the original source of the quote, there is a marked difference between criticism and disparagement. Making light of or downplaying someone’s situation isn’t the same as saying, “What you are doing is wrong”.
There is also a foundational difference between social consequences and governmental ones.
They say I’m not allowed to look at them