Do you usually only read one source and decide that’s enough information or is it just because climate science keeps having worse and worse news that you do this?
I now know enough to know that AR6 was concluded 2 years ago and since then there has been increasing evidence that our most dire models are actually rather optimistic. Even if we went carbon zero today temperature would still continue to uptick for years do to runaway affects that we were unaware of.
That’s not how climate science works. The IPCC reports detail the current scientific consensus. Single papers do not change the consensus as soon as they are published.
IPCC AR6 on the contrary said things are better than we thought in AR5, and downgraded the likelyhood for the worst scenarios to play out.
You tried friend. Best to just leave this one be. Some people just want to live in their own world and refute reality even when presented overwhelmingly loads of evidence to the contrary.
You tried save your sanity trust me I’ve gone that road with others before it is not worth your time or energy till they are willing and able to hear you.
Don’t bother arguing with the doomers here. I think you’re right, but you’re indirectly attacking their nihilism and that makes them uncomfortable. Eventually they’ll find something that makes them want a future or they’ll get old and realize they have nothing.
No.
… and if you believe differently, please cite the relevant sections from IPCC AR6 to support the statement.
Exaggerating climate science is also climate science denialism.
Do you usually only read one source and decide that’s enough information or is it just because climate science keeps having worse and worse news that you do this?
If you don’t know what the IPCC does I think you should study that first and then reply.
I now know enough to know that AR6 was concluded 2 years ago and since then there has been increasing evidence that our most dire models are actually rather optimistic. Even if we went carbon zero today temperature would still continue to uptick for years do to runaway affects that we were unaware of.
That’s not how climate science works. The IPCC reports detail the current scientific consensus. Single papers do not change the consensus as soon as they are published.
IPCC AR6 on the contrary said things are better than we thought in AR5, and downgraded the likelyhood for the worst scenarios to play out.
Have you read any IPCC reports?
Have you read the experts that point out the IPCC has continuously been overly conservative?
You tried friend. Best to just leave this one be. Some people just want to live in their own world and refute reality even when presented overwhelmingly loads of evidence to the contrary.
You tried save your sanity trust me I’ve gone that road with others before it is not worth your time or energy till they are willing and able to hear you.
Hope you have a great day :)
You really don’t understand how the scientific method works.
That makes you a climate science denier.
So you just picked one single document and shout down any climate opinion not based on that document? Did you even try reading the post?
If you don’t know what the IPCC does I think you should study that first and then reply.
Don’t bother arguing with the doomers here. I think you’re right, but you’re indirectly attacking their nihilism and that makes them uncomfortable. Eventually they’ll find something that makes them want a future or they’ll get old and realize they have nothing.