• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 个月前

      I’ve wondered about just SAMs and MANPADs as an alternative to any new fighter jet. We can’t really trust the F-35 and the alternatives (the Gripen E) might not be survivable, depending on a bunch of data I don’t have.

      Sure, they can’t be used offensively, but that’s not the main thing I worry about in the near future.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 个月前

      Until someone comes up with a very compelling anti-drone countermeasure, drones are basically the ideal weapon for a battlefield. Cheap, mobile, can loiter, good recon, etc.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      drones. If Canada should sink funding into anything, it should be that.

      ECM says what?

  • breezeblock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 个月前

    The real concern is not “which aircraft to buy” — its “in 20 years will Canada be able to even arm itself in a world of disrupted supply chains?”

    Agreed that drones are tactically important, but tanks and fighters ships are strategically important, and will never go out of style.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      No more than what we’re spending on the F35. We could design 10 new aircraft for that price