lemmy.mixdown.ca
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago

Biden Administration Moves to Tighten Fuel Economy Rules

www.nytimes.com

external-link
message-square
13
link
fedilink
106
external-link

Biden Administration Moves to Tighten Fuel Economy Rules

www.nytimes.com

silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
13
link
fedilink
The proposal is designed to help speed the country’s transition to electric vehicles, one of the president’s signature efforts to fight climate change.

Archived cooy

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • fosiacat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    and ironically has signed more drilling permits than dopey trump.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes. US law treats the right to drill as a property right once a lease is issued. Makes it tough to actually say no. His administration tried a moratorium, lost in court, and concluded an appeal would not succeed. There are environmentalists who wanted the appeal tried, but didn’t win out on that

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        There was also Biden buckling to Manchin’s demands which included mandating drilling. Concessions had to make within his own Party.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          He buckled in a way that’s cutting emissions.

          • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yes, in negotiating down BBB to get Manchin’s support.

        • echo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          what exactly was he supposed to do if he didn’t have enough senators to get it passed without Manchin’s support?

          • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Eh, I think it is fairly moot as Biden would have to have confidence that progressive policy (especially regarding climate change) has popular support and he would not be blamed (or even hurt) by pushing for their passage.

            Manchin and Biden would almost certainly have stood to benefit from having passed BBB in the first place. Before that they and the Democratic Party would have had a net benefit passing the Green New Deal.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        are you talking about the moratorium on the leasing itself of federal land?

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Removed by mod

    • GiddyGap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Don’t worry, Republicans will only remember the climate measures and seek petty revenge.

  • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Removed by mod

  • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Good

    • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Credit where credit is due.

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 349 users / day
  • 2.02K users / week
  • 4.13K users / month
  • 5.35K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 6.55K subscribers
  • 4.24K Posts
  • 20.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7@slrpnk.net
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org