“Price optimization” consultants are helping clients capitalize on Trump’s chaotic tariff rollout by using surveillance pricing tools, while Republican FTC chair Andrew Ferguson is reversing efforts to keep them in check.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I was reading an article talking about how the people most-severely being taxed by the tariffs are relatively poor. First, tariffs are a regressive tax anyway — it’s a tax roughly linked to consumption. Consumption taxes are regressive anyway, and I’ve talked about that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumption_tax

    Flat consumption taxes are regressive (shift the tax burden to the less well-off). The ratio of tax obligation to income tends to shrink as income increases because high-earners tend to consume proportionally less of their income.[25] An individual unable to save will pay taxes on all his income, but an individual who saves or invests a portion of his income is taxed only on the remaining income.

    But secondly, what the article was pointing out was that it’ll hit inexpensive household goods out of China, stuff like clothing and whatnot, and the people who get whacked by that the hardest are people buying inexpensive everyday items.

    It’s kind of amazing, actually. West Virginia was the most pro-Trump state in the elections. But they have the highest rate of Medicaid dependence, something that will take a hit, and then they’re going to take a clobbering from tariffs on inexpensive items. The tax cuts that Trump’s passing that all this is paying for are principally for the wealthy, aren’t going to be very helpful for them.

    • Nemean_lion@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yup, and they are all too stupid to understand thanks to the erosion of America’s education system. I’m seeing the same in Canada, and it’s the worst. They don’t even have grades in school anymore.