i think its peertube

because 1: video hosting is expensive

2: it wasn’t easy for server admins to get money

3: there probably won’t be a youtube exodus for a long time or probably ever

(ignore my opinion)

  • YourBestFriend@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Agreed. Video is a lot of data. I’d be curious if a platform could ever exist that successfully reprogrammed content creators to NOT try for monitozation lengths (10 minutes) and NOT constantly say like and subscribe. Haha.

    • Adniem@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      but i hope some day, we find out a monetization way, that is ethical and doesnt hurt anybody

        • Adniem@thelemmy.clubOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          maybe as well (not related) if those people making videos, perhaps sorry to say it, but had a job that is consistent

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Probably Peertube because it has a Nazi bar problem. It is interesting that Mastodon doesn’t, but that’s because Truth Social doesn’t federate so it stays contained.

    • Adniem@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      what do you mean by “Nazi Bar Problem” (i am not a person who speaks english natively and also i am a bit of a beginner)

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is a story that, if a bar starts to accept Nazis in as patrons, they quickly take over the place so that the bar becomes known as the bar that Nazis or people on with Nazis go to.