• supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 天前

    No because the pursuit of public health for kids is not the same as the pursuit of things that make you feel righteous about protecting kids, they are often existentially opposed as they are in this case.

    • DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 天前

      Uh huh…

      Have you seen studies on the addiction level of opiates, or narcotics?

      What’s your solution for dealing with the negative societal outcomes for the levels of addiction in people in a society devoid of any prohibition?

      I assume you will say “legalize everything like Portugal” or something similar. What does that look like to you?

      • supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 天前

        Show me the evidence before you try to find the details in my views to focus in on and distract from the larger point here with.

        • DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          25 天前

          Evidence of what? That meth, opium and cocaine are addictive?

          Is it your position that they aren’t?

          What evidence are you looking for?

            • DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              25 天前

              What do you think the purpose of prohibition on underage drinking, narcotics or opiates is for?

              • supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                25 天前

                To make adults feel like they solved the problem of alcohol abuse with kids so they can feel better about themselves?