• kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      disagree, its actually literally not criminal. They dont get to just barge onto private property and do whatever they want. They need a warrant. And no one is required to help them in any way. Their mission is their problem, not anyone elses in a private healthcare setting. They can wait in the waiting room with their thumbs up their asses like everyone else.

      This is a catholic hospital. Shame on the catholic church for collaborating with fascism. again.

      • protist@retrofed.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Catholic hospitals have pretty much nothing to do with the church today. They are exclusively businesses, and they pay less taxes because they operate as religious nonprofits.

    • moustachio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ohh! I love it when we LARP that we have some sort of legitimate legal / justice system!

      We have an enforcement arm for the parasitic pedophile rapist class.

      • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m an anarchist, brainlet, I just think it’s embarrassing to try and get mad at the hospital about it.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          You’re just flat wrong though - the police do not have the right to enter a hospital beyond the public sections (generally, the waiting rooms) without a warrant or permission from the hospital. The hospital in this case gave the police that permission, and unless a statute exists in Michigan specifically allowing this (if one exists I haven’t found it), they are absolutely at fault for doing so.

          • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Wrong. That’s why the guy got away and she was able to assist him in the first place, specifically because they weren’t barging into operation areas.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              My goodness, am I really?

              ICE agents accompanied him into the hospital but did not thoroughly guard him at all times. […] Then, Chloe Freeman, a Registered Nurse working her shift, entered the CT room, spoke with O.B.P., and helped him walk through several doors, exit the hospital, and walk out free. He has not been recaptured. (emphasis mine)

              Oh - I’m terribly sorry, but you appear to be mistaken. ICE were allowed into the hospital, and as written did not accompany him into the radiology room (since personnel generally do not stand around CT scanners due to the radiation hazard this makes sense). So the hospital does therefore seem to have been at fault for allowing them to accompany the patient - but thank you for looking out for accuracy in comment sections!

              • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I’m confused by the whole “fault” thing. I EMT’d for about a decade, and there were times we had police escorts, and they’d absolutely come all the way in and stay with the patient the whole time. Just my experience, and maybe I’m confused by the point you’re making.

                That being said, the hospital is private property. The hospital presumably has an understanding, and it may be written and memorialized in some sort of agreement, that cops are welcome on the property, in the same way just about anyplace that exists in society does. Maybe not a private residence, but anywhere public may go.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  Ah sorry for not being clearer. The “fault” is not liability or similar but social falt; complicity. The casual or formal arrangement with the police allowed the persecution of this nurse.

                  Yes cops are often allowed in (elsewhere I list off some of the various situations I’ve seen for allowing police non-warranted entry in these sorts of arrangements) but it’s almost never blanket permission, as that leaves the hospital legally open for all kinds of tedious lawyer shit (lots and lots of hippa mostly) and the more permissive agreements generally still have stipulations about medical staff assent. However they are still required to have a warrant if that permission agreement isn’t in place to access any non-public (“anywhere you’d need a vistor badge for” is a helpful way to think of it, even if the badge itself isn’t required. The definition of what is considered public/private is quite fascinating if you’re a huge boring asshole (like me) - for example in some jurisdictions, separate warrants are required to access the private hospital areas and patient treatment areas / rooms.

                  (Sorry for the nerd ramble, I was recently on a project collecting and collating these agreements so I have Read. So. Many.)