• chrash0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    It shouldn’t have to take fifteen years to deploy effective products that can save lives

    this is such a reductionist view.

    it should absolutely take decades to make a sweeping decision to fundamentally alter an ecosystem. nobody likes disease or even getting a random bite. i grew up in the swamps of the US, i know. but we should absolutely know what we’re doing to release a genetically engineered or bacterial sterilizing agent into a naturally evolved ecosystem.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      These techniques are targeted at individual species, not all mosquitoes, and the species in question are invasive species. If it was targeting native mosquitoes your comment would make more sense, but in this case the ecological effects should be neutral to positive.

      • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Careful. Targeted bacteriological or viral methods can adapt once out in the open. What you ultimately cause may not be what was intended. What other creatures share traits that might be susceptible? Let’s not pretend we’ve genomapped and understood everything out there.

        Also mosquitos and their larvae are food for parts of the food web. If they are gone, what starves?

        Unintended consequences are a real risk. Careful study should be required.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      There’s a large difference between 15 years of science to make sure something doesn’t do more harm than it prevents, and taking a decade before someone even declares themselves as responsible for evaluating anything.