A juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new details about what he said happened inside the jury room that led to a mistrial in the case of the Massachusetts woman facing first-degree murder charges for the 2023 deaths of her three young children.

Nick Dargie, one of the three men on the 12-person jury, told ABC News’ Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict did not show any evidence explaining his vote.

“There was several times I would ask him to show us evidence or, you know, describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and … he couldn’t,” Dargie, 25, said in an interview Wednesday.

  • isekaihero@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    6 days ago

    Three dead children isn’t enough evidence? Are you all fucking insane?

    11 of those 12 jurors should never serve on a jury again. Fucking insane nutjobs.

    • Geologist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      The trial was never about if she killed the kids or not (everyone is in agreement she did it), it was about if she was legally insane when it occurred.