ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 26 days agoDebian developer Antoine Le Gonidec resigns after option allowing corporate LLM use without disclosure wins votelists.debian.orgexternal-linkmessage-square150linkfedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down12
arrow-up111arrow-down1external-linkDebian developer Antoine Le Gonidec resigns after option allowing corporate LLM use without disclosure wins votelists.debian.orgProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 26 days agomessage-square150linkfedilink
minus-squareBlackLaZoR@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·25 days ago fascist-backed technology to be known. And you’ve lost me already
minus-squareSenal@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·25 days agoWord choice or disagreement with the assertion as a whole?
minus-squareBJW@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 days agoCars are fascist-backed technology. So are computers. Highlighting such a fact is irrelevant.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-224 days ago Cars are fascist-backed technology. Ford cars are certainly fascist-backed. Volkswagons, too. Idk if I’m going to stick the label on the Olinia or the Renault. So are computers. The Chilean Fascist Augusto Pinochet famously shot all of his country’s computers for being Communist. Highlighting such a fact is irrelevant. Weird that you’d bring it up. Weirder that you’d get so many of your facts wrong.
minus-squareBJW@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 days agoYou’re pointing out brands. Brands can be fascist. The OP is pointing out technology. Technology cannot be fascist.
minus-squareson_of_darkness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·24 days agoIt’s not, they have different potential consequences
minus-squareBJW@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·24 days agoEverything has different potential outcomes…
minus-squareBJW@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·24 days agoExactly. It’s all nonsense. But we need to single out this nonsense in particular and hate it. Because it has different potential outcomes…
minus-squareson_of_darkness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·24 days agoIt’s not allnnonsense. LLMs are being used to “solve” small problems but pollute way more than normal datacenters, way more than you using your personal computer etc. You seem heavilly invested in denying any bad thing from LLMs …
minus-squareBJW@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·24 days agoBecause you conflate data centers with LLM. Data centers are bad. LLM are not.
And you’ve lost me already
Word choice or disagreement with the assertion as a whole?
Cars are fascist-backed technology. So are computers. Highlighting such a fact is irrelevant.
Ford cars are certainly fascist-backed. Volkswagons, too. Idk if I’m going to stick the label on the Olinia or the Renault.
The Chilean Fascist Augusto Pinochet famously shot all of his country’s computers for being Communist.
Weird that you’d bring it up. Weirder that you’d get so many of your facts wrong.
You’re pointing out brands. Brands can be fascist.
The OP is pointing out technology. Technology cannot be fascist.
It’s not, they have different potential consequences
Everything has different potential outcomes…
What does that even mean?
Exactly. It’s all nonsense. But we need to single out this nonsense in particular and hate it. Because it has different potential outcomes…
It’s not allnnonsense. LLMs are being used to “solve” small problems but pollute way more than normal datacenters, way more than you using your personal computer etc. You seem heavilly invested in denying any bad thing from LLMs …
Because you conflate data centers with LLM.
Data centers are bad. LLM are not.