Lady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.com to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 8 days agoWhat's your thoughts on the Lyndsey Clancy case?message-squaremessage-square21linkfedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down124
arrow-up1-11arrow-down1message-squareWhat's your thoughts on the Lyndsey Clancy case?Lady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.com to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 8 days agomessage-square21linkfedilink
minus-squaredisregardable@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·8 days agoNo, it’s not illegal for a juror to come to a different conclusion than the rest of the panel. people are so annoying.
minus-squareStarya67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·8 days agoJuries should not make medical decisions anyway. Apparently that conclusion contradicted “reasonable doubt”, by the way.
minus-squareLady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·8 days agoFrom what I’ve read they refused to apply the law as directed by the judge. I totally support them having a different verdict but this is different
minus-squaredisregardable@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·8 days agoThat is the interpretation of the people who disagree with his conclusion.
No, it’s not illegal for a juror to come to a different conclusion than the rest of the panel. people are so annoying.
Juries should not make medical decisions anyway.
Apparently that conclusion contradicted “reasonable doubt”, by the way.
From what I’ve read they refused to apply the law as directed by the judge. I totally support them having a different verdict but this is different
That is the interpretation of the people who disagree with his conclusion.