lemmy.mixdown.ca
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago

Banning fossil fuels is now a make-or-break issue at climate talks | Many countries want a rapid phaseout of oil, gas and coal, but major powers — notably Saudi Arabia — are strongly resisting

wapo.st

external-link
message-square
9
link
fedilink
171
external-link

Banning fossil fuels is now a make-or-break issue at climate talks | Many countries want a rapid phaseout of oil, gas and coal, but major powers — notably Saudi Arabia — are strongly resisting

wapo.st

silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
9
link
fedilink
Banning fossil fuels is now a make-or-break issue at climate talks
wapo.st
external-link
Many countries want a rapid phaseout of oil, gas and coal, but major powers — including Saudi Arabia and China — are strongly resisting.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 years ago

    Places that rely heavily on fossil fuel exports shouldn’t even be consulted on this. We know their stance. Just let them know what the rest of the world that wants to continue living in a hundred years decides and they can adapt.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Unfortunately the talks rules require “consensus” which has almost always been interpreted as "unanimity " in order to do anything. Having a petrostate running it doesn’t help either

  • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I am totally shocked by this

    • Starkstruck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Truly no one could’ve predicted this.

  • Vendul@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Heat pump subsidies are already available in 30+ countries making up 70% of the global space heating demand.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      A lot of places, including the US and much of Europe, are subsidizing heat pump installation already.

      • Vendul@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          The Saudi’s should try that line. “What’s wrong with greenhouses? Every greenhouse I’ve ever been in is lovely.”

    • Kid_Thunder@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Perhaps but the answer to is have a clear goal to get off of reliance of fossil fuels. This doesn’t mean that it would be banned next week. Via subsidizing products, development and creating a near guaranteed market, there would be a lot of motivation to create alternatives that work.

      What is at issue is that there is a lack of a date in many of these proposed phase-outs. A deadline and milestones are supremely important.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    UN resolutions have no teeth anyway.

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 275 users / day
  • 1.5K users / week
  • 2.84K users / month
  • 6.98K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 7.75K subscribers
  • 6.64K Posts
  • 26.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7@slrpnk.net
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org