• stephen01king@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    You do realise he talked specifically about crashes that are caused by a feature advertised as self-driving and not every crash ever by a car brand, don’t you?

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      You do realize this was a reply to the following comment:

      Is ford guilty of every crash too?

      • stephen01king@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        That comment tries to misrepresent the argument by applying the accusation to every crash involved with the brand, but the comment you quoted correctly brought back the proper context by only applying it to crashes caused by a feature called Full Self Driving. Just because someone tried to sneakily change the context of the conversation, doesn’t make every comment in reply to it must follow that change.

        • saimen@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          But that’s the point. Everyone here is just assuming the crash was caused by Full Self Driving just because it was a Tesla.

          • stephen01king@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 days ago

            It was prompted by the mention of another crash that was centred around whether FSD was the cause or not. It was a discussion on the fact that Tesla will always claim that their self driving technology is never the one at fault, even in cases where it was clear that it was. Nobody here said all Tesla crashes are caused by the FSD.