- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
- science@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
- science@lemmy.ml
we need a distinction between “can it run doom” and "can it function as a grayscale display with ultra low fps "
Yeah, kinda sick of some of the so called Doom hacks.
I saw one where they claimed they made a pregnancy test play doom. No, the dude got a small OLED display that he hooked up to a computer that ran doom and displayed it, then put the OLED in a pregnancy test, where it normally had a different and likely worse OLED.
That isn’t the point of the can it run doom thing at all
Right but how else could they clickbait readers into reading their articles?
Add artificial intelligence somewhere in there
Did researchers just use AI to train ecoli to play doom??? No but watch these ads
the clickbait so god damn annoying now. it’s like yesterday when there was an article that PewDiePie made an AI to rival ChatGPT and it’s free. no. he vibe coded an LLM workspace. that’s it.
Or the Nostalgia bait articles “the Zip Drive was amazing!” no, no it wasn’t you weren’t there.
Same spirit as the nes “ports” that run an emulator in a rpi in the cartridge
Or when some guy ran Windows 95 with DOSBox on an iPhone and tech publications wrote articles about it.
The best one I’ve seen is where somebody run Minecraft via a VHS cassette. But that was fine because they weren’t claiming that the old CRT TV was now working as a computer, they just invented a Bluetooth VHS adaptor which in and of itself was quite cool.
This would have been better as a “Can it show Bad Apple” (which is cool too). “Can it run DOOM” should be about it actually running the program doom.
Bad apple?
Technically, the game is not running on E. Coli, but the display is E. Coli.
Cool none the less!
Release the ecoli DOOM speedrun!
Can you come back in a century or two?
Remind me in 300 years!
Finally enough resolution to watch 28 days later
Thought I’ve seen it before, from 2024. Still cool
Yep, still that same article from 2024. Still cool, indeed!
Did they say “M-S D-O-S computers”?!
Oh god, I feel old… The kids have forgotten how to pronounce “DOS”…
Man, we can run doom on bacteria but not neogeo
Wtf neogeo I thought you were cool
Since the E. coli here are only functioning as a screen, you could do the same thing with a neogeo and then write another clickbait article about it.
That 8 hour 20 minute spec for returning to baseline could probably be sped up a bit to improve the inter-frame timing
Modern monitors measure gray-to-gray time as the response, rather than black-to-black. So if she computed the 50% luminescence threshold time on the decay side, and then started injecting the next round at that time, could likely cut the decay time to closer to 200 minutes minutes for the first frame, and then probably double that for the inter-frame times, depending on the GFP decay rate.
Who knows, maybe she already took that into account. She seems to be well rounded.

From the charts in the video (above), it looks to be symmetrical near the peak, but the 50% concentration on decay is around 200 minutes minutes of decay followed by 70 minutes ramping up would put the inter-frame time to be about 3.5 hours.
I realize concentration of fluorescing enzyme may not be 1:1 with lumens emitted.
If this worked the way I imagine, This cuts the total time to play from 600 years to about 200 years. Rounded to 1 significant figure, since this is all ballpark math anyway.







