You just barely replied to the wrong comment.

You replied to the person asking what JTAG is instead of replying to the person who didn’t know what these “app connected only” Motorola devices are using.

Since the E. coli here are only functioning as a screen, you could do the same thing with a neogeo and then write another clickbait article about it.

It could no longer function all on its ohm.

If you want to dive into the court documents, you can here: https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=392880

But I would just recommend listening to some lawyers comment on the situation, like Opening Arguments: https://www.patreon.com/posts/idiot-ceo-used-153623405?collection=867807

That’s correct, revenue, not profit.

The CEO of Krafton was the one who signed the deal. He definitely had buyers remorse which is why he ended up ignoring his lawyers and turning to ChatGPT for advice on how to delay the release of Subnautica 2 and avoid the payout.

The judge extended the deadline on the bonus by 9 months (to September).

If Subnautica earns $69.8million in revenue by then, Krafton will need to pay up the full $250million to the team.

https://gamerant.com/subnautica-2-250-million-bonus/

Considering it sold 2 million copies in 12 hours, at $30 each, I’m assuming they’re very close to reaching that (if they haven’t already).

Link to the terms of service here: https://subnautica.com/en/policy/tos

I didn’t see anything about VPNs.

Besides that, it’s definitely an overreaching document. I expect it to get a failing grade at ToS;DR.

Edit: found the part for VPNs listed under the “prohibited uses” (emphasis my own):

use IP proxying or other methods to disguise the location of your use or Device, whether to circumvent geographical restrictions on the use of the Game, the Documentation or Services or for any other purpose or in a way that violates these Terms;

The only ones fired were the 3 co-founders. They were the ones who were set to receive the largest amount of the bonus (they had promised to put most of that back into the company and to share with the development team). The judge ordered that only one of them be brought back and for the deadline on the $250million to be extended by 9 months.

https://www.ign.com/articles/judge-slams-subnautica-2-publisher-krafton-in-victory-for-fired-workers-orders-company-reinstate-boss-and-extend-250-million-bonus

According to comments related to the investigation, the interface repeatedly checks whether all buttons fit within the available horizontal space. If the controls overflow, the system hides one of the buttons to free space. However, hiding the button changes the container’s width, immediately creating a new problem.

Once the button disappears, the available width appears enough for the interface to believe there is room again, causing the hidden button to reappear. The buttons then overflow once more, forcing the interface to hide the button again. The cycle repeats continuously at extremely high speeds.

I wonder if this affects any pages that have YouTube videos embedded as well.

Thanks I’ll try pinging them here in this thread… we’ll see how well this works.

@makertube@mastodon.social

Thanks for setting up this PeerTube instance! I just had a quick question (I’m not sure how this appears on mastodon for you):

Looking through the rules:

No videos containing violence, sexually explicit content, death or abuse in whatever form. For clarification, does this mean I couldn’t upload videos that I recorded while playing various games because it has a form of death/violence in it?

I’m thinking along the lines of popular games like No Man’s Sky, Clair Obscur, Baldur’s Gate 3, etc.

I get that hosting videos comes with a lot of risk, I wouldn’t want to try to take on hosting video content like this myself. I’m just trying to figure out how strict the rule on “violence” would be. Is this intended to ban any sort of gore, or would it apply even to something like stop motion/LEGO videos?

Looking through the rules:

• No videos containing violence, sexually explicit content, death or abuse in whatever form.

For clarification, does this mean I couldn’t upload videos that I recorded while playing various games because it has a form of death/violence in it?

I’m thinking along the lines of popular games like No Man’s Sky, Clair Obscur, Baldur’s Gate 3, etc.

I get that hosting videos comes with a lot of risk, I wouldn’t want to try to take on hosting video content like this myself. I’m just trying to figure out how strict the rule on “violence” would be. Is this intended to ban any sort of gore, or would it apply even to something like stop motion/LEGO videos?

Edit: typo

That wouldn’t be too far fetched. Pepsi is a much larger company than Coca-Cola. Practically everything in the snack aisle is owned by Pepsi.
Some of the companies/brands that PepsiCo already owns: Frito-Lay, Quaker, Gatorade, Mountain Dew, Naked, etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PepsiCo_brands

Showing up once a week isn’t a problem if it’s only a handful of people going to the same place.

However, when you have a lot of people on this device in a small area, you’ll have to ask them to go farther and farther away. Or else you’re going to outsource who is checking on the device, and that’s going to start driving up the price for this service.

Well, what sort of standards are these tools built to?

It’s very likely, although it could be hard to gauge since this only affects some users, or only on some videos.

I did notice that some videos stopped showing comments and a description in GrayJay for a short time, but after some updates I haven’t notice this happening recently. So, it’s likely that they did find a workaround for this issue.

Some other alternatives not reviewed:

• Spacebar
• TeamSpeak
• Root

Looks like they changed their name to Stoat.

You’re thinking of Guilded.

Looks like Roblox forced everyone using Guilded to suddenly have a Roblox account in 2024, and then Guilder officially shut down about 2 months ago (end of 2025).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilded

The bill – labeled AB 1720 – would make it illegal to resell a concert, theater, comedy or other live entertainment ticket (sports are not included) at a price higher than face value (the cost of the ticket plus fees from the primary ticketing source) plus 10% for shows taking place in California.

I’ve had to sell a ticket through ticketmaster because we weren’t going to be able to make it to the show. The problem is that I had to sell the ticket at a higher price just to break even with the fees that they add on.

At least with this bill we would still be allowed to sell it without taking a loss, but I wonder how it handles the case for when a ticket has been resold multiple times.

Still I think we really need a law like this if we want to tackle the scalping issue we have.

That looks like one very specific issue rather than a lot of issues of something to really worry about.

Personally I haven’t noticed had any issues uploading images for posts.