

There’s probably an XKCD about that.
There’s probably an XKCD about that.
“Pushback”
You lunatics need to calm the fuck down, you alienate anyone that doesn’t fall into your ridiculous hivemind with personal attacks and toxic behaviour.
Literally quibbling over semantics and it immediately becomes personal and hateful.
I am done with all of you, there is no discussion only vile behaviour.
Do you literally not see how doing it incidentally is worse?
They literally burned the planet down just to make more money, it wasn’t even a calculation to them, they had to do this for the sake of money.
Some evil villain insanely plotting in a mountain lair didn’t destroy the planet, there wasn’t a league of evil wearing flashy costumes, it was a bunch of “normal” people wearing grey suits, sitting in an office soberly making these decisions because the money required them to, their entire business operation depends on it.
The real villain is money, and my real issue is being screamed and accused at for trying to point this out.
Step down off your high horse son, you have made a lot of strange assumptions about the intent of my statement and who I am, and they are all completely off-base.
Literally just pointing out that their goal was to make money, and they didn’t care about the results. Their goal was not to destroy the planet like some sort of cartoon villain, the real villain was chasing money. I am not pro-oil or trying to defend these assholes, honestly the fact that killing the planet was incidental damns them even more.
Seriously though you gotta step the fuck off with this hateful and off-base bullshit, you have totally alienated me so you could go on your “brave” rant, when I am literally on your side and not any of the things you described me as in any way.
Wake the fuck up and treat people like humans instead of spreading needless hate online.
Yes their goal was to destroy the planet, that was their reason for mining oil or doing business at all. What a shrewd observation you have made.
Or you know, don’t vote for terrible people instead of basing it on what their job was? Just an idea.
deleted by creator
Ah that explains it, ty.
deleted by creator
BAH GOD IT’S SOCIALISM FROM BEHIND WITH THE STEEL CHAIR!
I mean, Pierre being a shittier more out of date version of the American right wing is pretty on brand for him. People say he’s a President’s Choice brand Trump, but that’s unfair, he’s more of a Great Value brand DeSantis really.
The sample size is 2, and both of them were terrible people before they got into politics.
Reagan was an authoritarian bootlicker who helped out communists as the President of SAG, he was already a fascist and was voted in because he was a fascist that was good at public speaking.
Not even gonna get into how shitty of a human being Trump was before being president, except to point out he was the biggest voice accusing Obama of faking his birth certificate.
Yeah seems really weird that a service with 2/3rds or more of the users than Discord is completely unknown to me or any of my fellas on the group discord when I asked them.
Can’t tell if I am falling out of touch, the service is aimed at a completely different demographic than me, or these numbers are bullshit.
deleted by creator
Instant subscribe, great video and a Canadian creator, gonna share this around and hopefully get you closer to the views you deserve!
What are you on about exactly? Also, second-best… you need to sulk off to wherever you think is better!
Oh I see, Nash Bridges just isn’t enough of a car-racing, hispanic sidekick having, San Fran cop for you.
I’m not even mad, I’m just disappointed.
Not '96-2001?
Nanook of the North (1922) is considered to be the first documentary ever made, so how is there a giant spike on the documentary graph at 1910, and a smaller one shortly after?
Haha good stuff ty.