

More sensationalism from the snake oil salesman.
More sensationalism from the snake oil salesman.
Based on the “Ai art” I’ve seen, they aren’t that unique…
Is this the Crack smoker we’re talking about?
I think u mean fReE sPeeCh
I’m a landlord. Never evicted anyone. It’s a super high risk position to be in. My mortgage isn’t free. The upkeep to my property isn’t free. Time spent vetting renters so my neighbors don’t have to live next to crackheads isn’t free. You pay rent so you don’t have to think about maintenence costs, mortgage, risking allowing others to live in property you spent money you worked for on. All of that and any other subtly is lost on here. Going to work and enjoying it is possible. The world isn’t black and white. Communism doesn’t work on a large scale. Etc.
Idk why the downvotes. It’s seriously off putting to be surrounded by people that clearly have no idea how the world works. It was funny before Trump. Now I take these meme waves with a grain of salt. Idiots in large numbers are dangerous. At least reddit was easy enough to use that the cesspool was diluted with less intense morons.
I’m no offended. It’s just weird listening to someone make shut up about something they clearly have no experience with outside of memes, while talking like it’s complete fact. It’s a strange thing to do.
Absolutely bizarrely incorrect take on like everything you’ve stated as though it were fact. This is some classic reddit hole-digging and I’m loving it.
You flat out haven’t used it.
Python isn’t (generally) compiled. Have you used python before?
List comprehension can actually do that, yes. This is one of the scripting aspects of python I use most commonly, and is probably one of its best-known features for creating “one liners”.
Same here, and honestly the quality is just trash,save for a few decent communities. No one went to reddit for the content. All the value is in the comments, and here there’s either very little interaction, or a worse circle jerk than reddit ever had. There are exceptions, but that’s been my experience.
If it is actually a single line ID argue that you do.
That is a bizarre opinion.
Sorry I missed your response, what actual utility does this provide over a pocket?
Most scifi movie things you can think of would be on the table.
Land ownership (in the US) already is public. What problem would this solve? What problems would it create? How would the solutions outweigh the problems?
Ok but for real that’s a pocket with extra steps. I choose what I wear based on what I need my clothes to do. If you have a pile of crap to lug around, the easy solution is to wear clothes that accommodates your crap. What possible utility would this provide that you don’t get from some decent pants?
Yeah this is pretty much him. Sounds great at first glance but if you spend any time with him he’s just another techbro libertarian that thinks he’s saving the world. His content is miserable sensationalism that leans so hard on the negative that I genuinely get depressed watching it now. I can’t take anything he says at face value, it all feels cynical or coded libertarianist nonsense now.