I agree that it does feel alarmist, but to be fair, the article mentioned multiple times that the research isn’t established just yet. In the end it sort of reminds me of the radiation doses from x-rays and CT scans. You have to weigh the potential risks with the potential benefits when deciding to practice with a firearm.

Just gonna point out that correlation does not imply causation. The argument needs to be deeper than just the stats.

How was work there? Why’d you leave?

I had the same issue, and was looking for a solution. Funny thing is that I wasn’t able to see this comment either because it’s marked as English. Maybe it would be useful for others facing the same issue if you could edit the comment and mark the language as ‘Undetermined’