Amazon was using people to train the model, so at the starts it would be 100%, but eventually the goal would be to get near zero, maybe the average was 70% but when the ended it was near 40%?

Difference is, the mouse can’t die, a person can. But the mouse can be continued by anyone…

Those are all binary outputs, neurolink allows analog.

Totally different goals, so no nothing else exists currently.

Got a link to share? Nothing else can do analog inputs like neurolink can, so would love to see this tech that isn’t even been talked about yet that you’re spouting all over this thread.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Than why doesn’t the tech exist yet…?

On/off isn’t the same as being able to control the input incrementally.

EEG and neurolink are two different techs accomplishing quite different goals in the end,

EEG can’t input analog inputs, neurololink is accomplishing an entirely different tech, so that’s quite literally impossible. Sorry.

EEG can’t accomplish the same thing, it doesn’t have analog control, mario cart has analog steering and in the video you can see it working.

It’s an entirely different tech meant to do something else, so no an eeg chop cannot ever accomplish the same thing.

You’re spreading misinformation all over this thread.

EEG is an extremely limited tech, they are looking for a way to advance past those limitations.

We can’t just not advance ever since someone might get hurt, that’s just asinine.

No, which is why people are trying to find better tech.

EEG is limited, it’s why it went nowhere and people try to point to it as this big huge thing…. Technology won’t advance if we just continually stick with the limitations of old tech. Which unfortunately requires experimentation.

Removed by mod

Some people think 1 death is too many.

They did, it’s probably not as good tech, which is why they are looking for better….

There are creatures with more or less intelligence and therefore more or less capacity of suffering.

…. So it’s okay to make less intelligent creatures suffer…? Intelligence has literally nothing to do with something’s capacity to suffer. Where the hell did you get that from? Let’s see some citations on that asinine claim lmfao.

You need data from every step of the way… so no…. Not at all.

1. You can in fact test many of these devices in mice and even zebrafish.

So your solution to animal testing is other animal testing? Strange solution.

Nothing will ever be risk free, and most of the subjects stayed alive until euthanized to see the results. How else would you get the results?

What’s the alternative for brain related experiments? Just not advance ever?

trade associations representing gas utilities and furnace manufacturers filed formal appeals to strip out the pro-electrification measures.

This is also the unfortunate reality of unions, and it’s frustrating that they use different terms to differentiate themselves from the negative things they do behind the scenes.

They protect their workers, by strong arming codes to make things union only, or for things to take longer so it’s more work.

all your lawyer has to do is point out the ordinary meaning of the word rape encompasses the plaintiff’s crime.

You can’t use ordinary meanings in the court of law… that’s the entire issue and why it’s a thing. You say ordinary, and than use the word crime. Now you would need to use the legal definition instead of ordinary, if it was a thing, which it isn’t… You shot your own foot in that situation.