Husband, Father, IT Pro, military service.

Don’t assume, ask. Don’t assume questions are statements or accusations.

I’d rather talk about difficult and nuanced topics in personal one on one situations over espresso or beer. Such discussion is very difficult in Internet written form.

I believe everyone should be treated with dignity and respect, but that doesn’t mean I agree with everything or everyone.

I have conservative and progressive views. I believe people can be both.

  • 4 Posts
  • 169 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 11th, 2024

help-circle










  • This story, like most corporate stories these days, frustrates me.

    This is a tale as old as time…the time when American corporations went to shit as our elected officials ensured there was no liability and realistic legal consequences to executes or MBA decision making.

    I’m not a business scholar obviously. I’ve always been led to believe that in order for the world to turn and air to be breathable, corporations and businesses need liability protection for those who run it. Why?

    If I kill someone with my car, even if it was completely an accident, I’m still liable right? Should I account for the death of that person, child, etc?

    How would things not be better if, instead of the bottom line and stock price being the ultimate concern of CEOs, it was them not going to court to face charges because they allowed their company to kill people with its negligence? I know there’s some nuance here, but ultimately, I feel like everything sucks because there’s no incentive to care about anything but investors and greed.

    If industry, aerospace or other, was run by people who cared about not killing people and going to jail, would they in turn ensure their design and production met the quality and ambition of the type of people here, discussing their accounts of cutting corners or experienced personnel just to save money?










  • Doesn’t the Democratic party have complete majority control of most cities and the state legislature?

    That’s a party which usually claims to be about taking care of poor people or ‘housing is a human right’, but I keep seeing evidence that part of California’s issue is residents eliminating any/all zoning that isn’t classic single family homes in places where there’s tons of good jobs, but super expensive housing.

    It’s hard to wade through political party propaganda, but I thought this was well documented.

    I don’t live in CA, so I don’t really know more than articles publish, but it just seems like they voted for the more American liberal/progressive party and still aren’t getting those values?