That citation has nothing to do with mathematical knowledge. It’s assertion of attributes that religious people deem relevant for personhood before god. It admits AI capabilities insofar as they’re undeniable, but then focuses on assertions what this does not mean.

Coming from a religious household nothing about this is a surprise. It’s very well articulated, but it still does not carry any special insights. It’s a completely predictable position for a religious leader.

This neo tech fascism has little in common with conservatism, other than conservatives who can’t differentiate of course.

The USA truly is the world leader in standing up for and to human rights.

I only use tokens from pure inference providers. Those that don’t have training in their business model.

Not necessarily, if that is supported by law. But it will certainly make companies rich.

Can the university legally punish attackers without a conviction?

The system works as intended by those who set it up.

Glad to know it’s seven conditions that Iran wants to be met. The article made the number very clear, and also that Iran is set and firm about this.

Everything else I would expect from a somewhat journalistic medium is missing. For example, what these seven conditions are, in what way they were agreed upon in June, why they are still allegedly not met.

Nothing there, just a very poor repetition of the Iranian position. Not worth the paper it was not printed on, but also not worth a repost.