prole

No. I would say that “this is all because” I made an innocuous (and purposely bad) joke about sentient cookies in response to that.

That really seemed to set you off for some reason. So then it was off to the races, one bad (but completely neutral) joke after another and each time you got seemingly more and more upset… Which I found hilarious in a meta sort of way.

Anyway, it doesn’t matter, it’s all here in the open to see. Not that literally anyone else on the planet should waste the brain cells reading it.

And here I am doing what I said I wouldn’t. It would be nice if Lemmy had that option like reddit where you can disable inbox replies so I don’t have to see your befuddled questions…

Honestly, this shit is so strange. Like are you even for real? You got mad at me for making bad jokes and it’s getting to the point of creepiness.

Did I seem upset at those comments? Or did I just make silly jokes about them? I mean seriously dude, take a step back. Maybe log off the internet for a day or two and interact with some real people because… yikes.

I’m done indulging this bizarre obsession you’ve got. This will be my last reply here. I hope you work out whatever you need to work out.

Go back and read the thread… I was making neutral jokes like the one about the bridge you’re selling being in Baltimore (which, c’mon, pretty good).

You, my friend, are the one who made it personal and turned it negative. I just followed your lead.

Is that what it was? You think I gave a shit about that? You definitely have it twisted. I made a corny joke and it triggered you. I probably should have just let it go there, but sometimes I just can’t help myself…

And the funny thing is, looking back at your ad hominems… They’re just soooo bad lol. That’s why I kept going. Just go back and look at the shit you were saying, it’s so dumb lol.

My jokes were completely neutral, and at first I thought they weren’t that bad. Like the Baltimore thing? You’re the one who made it personal.

Well, 1 - you think I wanted to have to explain a, frankly, stupid throwaway bit to some rando on the internet because he just can’t grasp the concept of someone on the internet acting differently in a comment for laughs?

And,

What was that about being on the spectrum

2 - Unlike your comment, my comment about being on the spectrum was 100% neutral, or if anything, pretty friendly I thought. Kind of a bit low to use that in a derogatory way.

It’s fine if you don’t get it… as we all know jokes become funnier the more you explain them…

But maybe I was intending to show my complete ambivalence toward you and the original topic of this comment thread by continuing with obviously awful, anti-jokes that were related to your comment, but not to the actual content of the comment? To refuse to engage with anything you said, and instead choosing to make the dumbest, most annoying jokes ever in the hopes that you’d just go the fuck away. You’d think most people would get the hint and just ignore it.

And then when it clearly triggered you very quickly, and the ad hominems started flying… I knew that I had to continue.

You made yourself a mark when you thought my “jokes” were being told in earnest, but you showed everyone who you really were when you almost immediately resorted to personal attacks.

At this point I just need to assume that you’re on the spectrum.

In which case, I apologize if it was inappropriate to mock you for not realizing that my comments were silly jokes (essentially dad-level).

I think it’s kind of adorable that you took everything I said seriously.

baked

Probably the first and only correct thing you’ve said about me. At least I think… I pretty much immediately lost interest in, and forgot what this little sub-thread is even about. Besides fucking with you.

I truly hope that you understood that my last few comments were facetious.

Oh wow. Whoa! You’ve encountered sentient cookies?! And not only that, but they have intellect that surpasses some humans?! I

That sounds pretty extraordinary; why don’t you have a Nobel prize?

Oh… Well I’ll pass. My background in engineering and construction tells me that it would be an awful investment due to liability and cost of maintenance/upkeep, especially given our crumbling infrastructure.

Thanks for the heads up though. Where do you even find a sale like that, Zillow?

Christian’s are actually respecting that there’s legal protections to nature worship, much less non indigenous nature worship

Yeah highly doubt that…

Keep in mind, that article is about events that occurred in 2005. To say a lot has changed since then would be a colossal understatement. Especially when we’re talking about the attitudes of the average Republican then vs. now.

Hopefully it’s not in Baltimore

The human experience is vast, and it’s presumptuous, naive, and arrogant to pretend to know the full extent of what other people believe.

The religious lawsuit is kind of bullshit,

Would it be bullshit if this were about Christian inmates being denied the ability to receive communion? Or if they were forcing Muslim or Jewish inmates to break halal and kosher respectively by making them eat certain things?

Remind me what the First Amendment is about again?

Also, quick google search found this SCOTUS case from 2005 that seems pretty cut and dry regarding this type of thing: https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna8047388

Indulge me for a moment, and read the first paragraph of this article:

The Supreme Court sided Tuesday with an unusual alliance of the Bush administration, liberal activists and conservative religious groups, agreeing that state prisons must accommodate the beliefs of witches, Satanists and other followers of non-mainstream religions.

Can you imagine reading that amidst the Satanic Panic 2.0 we’ve been experiencing these past few years? LOL. They would completely ignore the implications that the case would have on their beliefs, knowing full well that the rules would continue to be applied selectively. That way they’re “hurting the right people.”

Any conservatives who were of voting age back then: would love to see you actually reckon with this. I mean, you won’t, but it would be nice.

The religious lawsuit is kind of bullshit,

I think most people know it from the famous Sublime song…

I don’t practice Santeria, I ain’t got no crystal ball,

Well I had a million dollars but I… I’d spend it all.

I thought this was a D&D alignment chart at first… And yes, Inkjet printers are chaotic evil.

And those sentences would be enforced by whom exactly?

Similarly, they could try Putin in absentia and sentence him to all manner of things, but in reality what do you think actually happens to him? Right, nothing.

What do people think the ICC is going to do? Any teeth it may have had in 1949 have long been removed, especially given the US’ essential ambivalence toward its existence.

I am far from a Taylor Swift fan, but this comment seems pretty clueless. How do you know she doesn’t have plans to give away most of it? She seems like the type of person that would. She’s also like 34 years old, so maybe give it a few years?

There are no billionaires who became such ethically… But I’m struggling to think of any that did it in a more ethical way than Swift. Especially after literally re-recording her entire catalogue to get around scummy capitalists that tried to unduly profit from her talent.