I get the n=1 argument, but there are many people who have successfully done it safely. The government’s job is just to make sure the equipment you buy is safe enough, not to protect you from every dangerous choice in life

My grandma did it for decades and didn’t blow anyone up. Nobody went blind either. You make it sound like it’s making a McNuke in your kitchen

Only if you use fruits. Grain or sugar has very little methanol when fermented

Initialisms weren’t even common back then when that word was first attested

Only to you. To a computer it’s the same thing, just some weights being adjusted by data

You literally can’t, though. That’s my point. The number of positions is just to high to store. Not even every computer in the world put together can store every legal chess position.

So in both cases the computer has to make an educated guess. Now the top engines use neural networks to make better guesses instead of brute forcing positions

Enemy of your freedom. Doesn’t even let AMD support 2.1 on Linux so Steam Deck or Steam Machine cannot support 2.1 with open source drivers! That’s why it’s officially only HDMI 2.0

Poor artists beg to differ

Chess strategy is extremely complicated and probably will never be completely solved. It will be almost solved like checkers eventually when programs will just draw vs. each other or a white win is found

But we will never actually simulate all games since the number of chess games dwarfs the number of atoms in the universe. So in that sense we will never know what the “correct” move is outside of table base or mate situations. Medicine may actually be less complicated to a machine.

Bu the only benchmark should be “how good the humans are at a task” since you’re not trying to be perfect. You only have to provide better results than the current system.

They came for the poor, and being a radiologist I didn’t speak out. They came for the millionaires and there was nobody to speak for me /s

Sometimes, for example human + AI systems used to be better than either one in isolation, but chess AI improved so much that the human partner is actually not helping anymore

That’s why you need something more hidden like xray that can camouflage as an h2 site

Okay, but there has to be a downside, surely?

If you only have one offer, your skills are not in demand

Yes, they actually block legitimate websites too, apparently

They have to pay the guy who did my job more, basically. This is because companies don’t really give raises adequately, so the guy doing my job actually will ask for more or he simply won’t accept the offer

It does matter.

When I connect to my VPN, the network sees that the server name is yahoo.com

It actually connects to my server which sends the request to yahoo.com and then replies with the cert. So the network sees that yahoo.com sent the cert back to my client from that IP address

Then there is a bunch of encrypted communication with timings and sizes that look like I’m downloading stuff over http.

I’d like to hear a credible model of blocking this

Xray-core is the one you want, very hard to block

Then how come in places like Austin, where they built housing the rents dropped?

Because if you’re roaming it creates a VPN, basically through the Chinese network

But it you want a lot of data, like for YouTube, you’re not going to want to pay roaming rates