im_fine_sandy

The last time this thread came up there were some convincing comments suggesting that the over torque protection for philips was not an intended feature.

My translation is: if people keep complaining about whatever bonds are we can invade Greenland or Uzbekistan or Herd Island.

You seem to have misunderstood, and the article you linked doesn’t contradict what I’ve said.

Wealthy, sophisticated LLM developers would not have been scraping old reddit. They would pay reddit for API access.

Shutting down old reddit closes the door on back yard developers, not OpenAI.

Additionally, when you run a prompt in a chatbot, it doesn’t scurry away and scrape old reddit and then formulate an answer. The scraping of content is going on while the model is being developed.

OpenAI would not have been scraping old ui?

Also most reddit content has long since been injested. No need to visit your http site anymore

You’ve fundamentally misunderstood the technology.

Oh, silly me. They have intuition and just say the first thing that they think of.

LOL.

We’re discussing whether LLMs can think and have intuition.

My point is, just because we can’t read the probability matrix with which they formulate their answers, does not mean they have intuition.

An LLM can’t read the matrix in which it stores its own parameters?

That’s like saying a human can’t read the neurons in their own brain. Sure, looking at them through a microscope, we can not.

You don’t seem to have any idea what you’re talking about.

Humans can not read or understand the probability matrix in which an LLM stores its parameters.

Incorrect.

LLMs do not have “thoughts” or “intuition” by any definition.

They organise tokens into groups based on statistical probability, and convert those tokens into words and sentences.

They can explain why they resolved a given answer, but he answer is always unsatisfying: this accumulation of tokens seemed to be the most likely response based on my probability matrix.

The problem you’re trying to convey is that humans can not summarise or read or understand a probability matrix with many billions of parameters.

No I’ve never bowsed imgur but I made the mistake of uploading a photo of my wife holding a chicken so I could post it to a back yard chicken forum, and the comments were enough to ensure I never posted anything there again.

Basically an unmoderated cess pool.

imgur is a swamp

Paradoxically, the paradox of tolerance is most often cited in the course of branding someone as “intolerant” and thereby excusing your intolerance of them.

Its a problem of semantics. Who really is sufficiently intolerant to be intolerable?

Because YouTube doesn’t engage in anything like that ofc.

Do you really actually believe that republicans really actually have a sinister plan to breed more slaves ?

It just seems kind of absurd to me. I’m sure there’s a few nutters that do want to breed slaves but not as a generally held premise.

I also think there are already sufficient slaves for whatever nefarious plan one might have.

In a bleak dystopian future where you have some kind of over-class that lives in fancy domes and the rest of us toil away in the wasteland, how many slaves or under-class do you need? Fewer than currently exist I imagine.

This debate is completely lost on me.

Someone was trying to explain that the reason she sends her kids to a private school is because she doesn’t want them to learn about sex when they’re too young.

I don’t get it.

I genuinely don’t see the problem with kids knowing everything their curious minds want to know about reproduction.

She said they’re too young to process it. I think she means they’re too young to process the weird moral overlay she wants them to adopt.

I think that part is just the authoritarian power structure. Everyone depends on him for their own slice, so keeping him in control is in their own interests.

The original comment:

I would put a urinal in as well. […] I’ve seen what other savages do to the toilet seat when they have to hit a stationary target from a couple feet away.

This guy:

Piss-soaked floors smell worse, but that’s not a urinal problem per se.

My comment:

Are you really suggesting that the addition of a urinal to a non-gender specific toilet would make it smell better ?

Your comment:

[toilets and urinals] will stack one on top of another, not cancel with each other.

In this context:

• my comment is not a straw man but responds to both the piss-soaked floor guy and the original comment
• you seem to agree with me. Added urinal means worse smell.

If only there was a single device that could act as a receptacle and disposal for both pee and poo.

Are you really suggesting that the addition of a urinal to a non-gender specific toilet would make it smell better ?

Well, I’m not sure that’s the correct use of the term but even if it were, my question is: why does nobody do that?

That’s not my observed experience.