Its been heavily traded and guardrailed to not make judgements.

While Reagan is the instrument that set America the path to hell, Bill Clinton was the right hand who crushed any idea of a rebound by labor. One can only assume both Clintons were critical in selling the DNC to capital.

That captures the insanity of the political positions very well.

They are not the same, they are both wholly inadequate positions.

If we are on a sinking ship and one person says, ill kill everyone and take the lifeboat for myself and someone else says, no lest kill 95% of everyone so that those who live wont be cramped neither is good enough. Sometimes choices should be made as a spectrum, sometimes choices should be made as a binary choice.

If you can’t see how dangerous both parties actions are on climate change you do not understand the danger. If you do understand then you are writing in malice.

You’re correct. Anyone spinning the “lesser of two evils” about climate change does not understand the risks. Inaction today will kill millions. Biden’s half-measures are fundamentally inadequate, and as you said, pretending otherwise is delusion or malice.

Climate change is the most severe threat to the safety of everyone everywhere. To treat it with anything other than total urgency is to promote harm. If you cannot find it in you to call out the short fall of the Democratic party on this issue you are part of the problem.

Then it needs to come with the right to public transport. And as access to transit becomes available access to cars requires a business need.

How recently did you try this?

They don’t exist?

Just build trains…

What are you using that makes it crash, virtually never happens to me.

That’s a pretty good analogy, but it’s Fortran and B-52. Fortran is very good at what it does to this day. Cobol was never good.

Cars that have never had a style update. Now that they exist in meaningful numbers they look old and tired.

If getting people back into work makes your property more valuable that the productive losses, it’s not a sunk cost. The leaders might be doing their math wrong, but they are not necessarily making a sunk cost fallacy here.

However, i do agree it’s likely a choice driven by power and personalities, not money. I suspect a lot of talk about how remote workers can be abused and controlled has happened.

They don’t have leases. They own that real estate. So its value is a considerable line item in the company’s value. If they get people in office, it’s a boost to the company’s value. The property is hit yet sunk in their eyes.

No, it does not. It means that they think it’s more profitable for shareholders.

Oh, so good news, the blood fugue is close to an end. I was worried this would get worse. /s

Internet should be a public utility and owned by the local government.

The core issue here is we don’t know how to measure the skill of learning directly.

Austin is not a better food city. It might be a better city, but not because of the food.

Houston has fantastic food. I will die on that hill.