

And reliable.
Since reading might be hard:
Overall, we rate the National Post Right-Center Biased based on story selection that favors the right and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
And reliable.
Since reading might be hard:
Overall, we rate the National Post Right-Center Biased based on story selection that favors the right and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Deleted, I misread the comment. Source saying that Israel controls whether they stay or leave?
A point no one contested, they’re simply forcing them to stay there.
Agree, Palestinians deserve better than Hamas.
If you say so. Mbfc doesn’t seem to have a problem with the source.
I treat their statements the same as I’ve seen this community treat statements from Iran. No problem right?
If only Hamas could have corroborated…
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ynetnews/
Overall, we rate Ynetnews as Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 5/19/2017) Updated (12/08/2023)
I do, I have more than just what not to do, I was hoping you could elaborate on an option other than violence. But it seems you can’t.
Before I give you what I think Hamas should do, are you declaring that you have no better option than violence, since that’s the only thing we eliminated? Unless that is, you advocate for violence.
I trust that when you say “fight” you don’t advocate for violence, considering we just eliminated that one option, correct?
In which case, I’d love to hear what you think that would entail.
In your opinion, what do you do? I’ve narrowed it down for you by 1 option.
Evidently I didn’t condom Israel in a post about Hamas.
Edit: bias is showing, y’all :) entertaining to say the least.
It’s not justification, it’s a reason?
Justification:
the action of showing something to be right or reasonable.
Reason:
a cause, explanation, or justification for an action or event.
Reasonable
based on good sense.
I won’t be responding to you anymore.
Edit: I’d like to document here (for myself mostly) how simply posting an article critical of Hamas’ actions is considered by members of this community as justifying violence.
Also because I think it’s funny considering the discussion chosen in the comments, FTA:
“Atrocities do not justify atrocities,” Sawyer said. “To stop the endless cycle of abuses in Israel and Palestine, it’s critical to address root causes and hold violators of grave crimes to account. That’s in the interests of both Palestinians and Israelis."
In other words, how I know the other two didn’t read the article without saying they didn’t read the article :)
This is some timely reporting… I hadn’t heard about this event!! /s
What even is the point of this post? We all know Oct 7 was a horrific, disgusting operation. We all agree Hamas is evil. It’s almost like a certain group of people are still trying to justify the ongoing war crimes and crimes against humanity by Israel in Gaza and the West Bank.
Actually, contrary to what you think you read, no one is doing that. The article was posted today, by human rights watch, so maybe you could email them asking about their timing. And there’s nothing in there about justifying violence.
However, I find it intriguing that you overlook the only other comment under this post attempting to justify Oct 7 (posted 40 minutes prior to yours). Almost like there’s direct evidence supporting the opposite of what you’re baselessly claiming.
https://lemmy.world/comment/11222615
Gaza was an open air prison enforced by Israel taking total control of Gaza’s borders, both north and south and even their sea border. It was a humanitarian crisis of people dying from lack of supplies like food and water.
What do you do as Gaza?
Calling for the murder of Jews = antisemitic. Doxxing doctors who have nothing to do with what’s going on in Israel = antisemitic.
This is normalizing hatred towards Jews.