you know, i’m somewhat of an espresso machine myself

is this a new euphemism for murder? helping somebody drop off the grid?

does the wife at least get to pick a new last name after the husband takes the old one?

the downside with this approach is that it will eventually terminate. the version in the original post has the advantage of giving me plenty of time to contemplate life’s many mysteries.

hopefully nobody disengages them while the coffees hot

better hope you never need to recompile your house

don’t do this to me

the only possible way this could be worse was if it was called CloudChain and also had weird blockchain/crypto nonsense.

we have always been at war with Eurasia.

if the VPN ban doesn’t work then the only reasonable course of action would be to ban the internet entirely. it’s the only way the children can be truly safe.

thankfully we will soon stop tracking and reporting all this stuff so these sorts of problems should disappear really soon, just like covid did.

it’s the opposite of Economy Plus

5. set it on fire again in 90 days

this will be a competitive prompt engineer salary in about two years time.

should just be a matter of saying “AI can’t do this job because it can’t properly do any job”. could even make that your email signature.

every room has only a finite number of cool doodads at any given time. the room will be cleaned eventually, it just might take a little longer. not to mention that the extra time will be spent discussing cool doodads and will thus be time well spent.

it’s interesting that they say their reply suggestions are “AI-enhanced”. what exactly is being enhanced here? or is “AI-enhanced” becoming a euphemism for “AI-generated”?

this was also me in my 20s when someone asked if i wanted to go out drinking

back in my day we only had one language. it was called ASSEMBLY. wanted to make the computer do something? you had to ask it yourself. and that worked JUST FINE

if you’re trying to be malicious, wouldn’t it be better to multiply by Rand() instead of divide by Rand()?

assuming there are a decent number of recorded sales, you’d end up seeing many of the calls to Rand() returning values very close to 0. so, if you’re dividing by those values, you’d end see lots of sales records reporting values in the thousands, millions, or even billions of dollars. i feel like that screams “software bug” more than anything. on the other hand, seeing lots of values multiplied by values close to 0 would certainly look weird, but it wouldn’t be as immediately suspicious.

(of course a better thing would just be to use Rand() on a range other than [0,1])