Yes, that’s how syndromes work. Having one or two of these things is expected. Having half of them isn’t.

I think that’s the nicest “LMGTFY” kind of response I’ve seen. Kudos to you, my friend.

At this point it’s hardly the law and the constitution. These are just unpredictable whims of the people in power.

It’s too hard to change anything if one believes in laws, rules and the general idea of a fair justice. They don’t have this limitation.

One of the problems that annoyed me in the past is the complexity and ambiguity of deleting an email over IMAP. Depending on whether it’s the last label of the deleted email, deleting an email from a label’s directory either removes a label from this email, or actually deletes the email.

Considering labels are very non-standard, which caused trouble over IMAP since forever, I wouldn’t count on that part.

We want other options to be allowed to exist. This is “you just want everyone to be gay/trans/whatever” all over again.

I wasn’t aware they added WebAuthn to the free plan recently. That’s great to hear, thanks for the correction!

I’d be perfectly okay with them just charging for Bitwarden, period. Instead they pretend it’s free but charge premium for all the most effective security features, including 2FA to their own services. Effectively it creates a group of people that use Bitwarden without access to these security features but complacent enough to not seek alternatives that would offer these features at a price acceptable for them (possibly free, like KeepassXC).

Bottom line: security shouldn’t be a premium feature. It should be either available or not at all. Never as a premium within the service.

DNS-based ad blocking is unfortunately much less effective. It’s still better than nothing though, that’s for sure.

The very notion of “less of a UB” is against the concept of UB. If you have an UB in your program, all guarantees are out of the window.