You should consider opnsense instead of pfsense in any case.

No, the article says it’s going to the King’s estate, i.e. the crown, not to the privy purse, i.e. Charles’ pocket.

Is some of it being used that will ultimately benefit him? Probably. But according to the article, the policy governing this says any benefit to the king himself should be merely incidental.

This article does not appear to allege that they are violating that policy.

Yeah, people who die with no heir typically get their stuff claimed by the state. This is pretty common around the world.

Stop aid to Israel, call for immediate ceasefire, send aid to Gaza, push Israel and Hamas to sit down for diplomatic talks

Yeah because the British people colonized it, and maintain control through superior military force.

Just go jerk off in the bathroom like a normal person.

I’m glad projects like the Internet archive exist, and they can’t just chuck the letter into the memory hole.

So they want to unload, put it on truck or rail, and load it again on the other side? I’m no logistics expert, but I feel like that introduces a lot of complexity compared to the time saved. Like, would this cargo have to go through customs? If not, wouldn’t it be easy to use this to smuggle stuff into and out of the country?

Why are you calling for extrajudicial killing? That would make you as bad as him.

That’s a bold claim. I’d be shocked if they had the manufacturing capability in Gaza for that. From what I’ve seen, the rockets have been North Korean imports.

Are Japanese people unique compared to other Asian peoples?

Including commiting genocide and various war crimes?

It worked so well for East Germany, after all.

Usually they have a “fairness meter” on their articles, but it seems to be missing from this one.

We can do both.

But note that “nuclear sub” refers to its power system, not armament. Nuclear subs can carry both nuclear and conventional weapons. This is not a threat to nuke Israel or Palestine.

Edit: per articles quoting the Navy dude, this is a guided-missile sub, not a ballistic missile sub, meaning it only carries convention weapons, no nuclear weapons. That is, Tomahawk missiles.

If they run, they’re Hamas. If they stand still, they’re well-disciplined Hamas.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37802116

If you search for “kids clothing”, when it goes to pull ads to put above the results, it fuzzes the search phrase for synonyms. So for example if TJ Maxx has purchased ads for “kidswear”, that’s a semantic match, so they’ll show the TJ Maxx ads even though it’s not one of the exact keywords they picked.

Wired retracted that article because the writer misunderstood the slides.

https://www.wired.com/story/google-antitrust-lawsuit-search-results/

Generally yeah, but I don’t think an established and recognized independent nation-state can say it’s fighting for its freedom.

Not in the formerly Palestinian territory, because all the Palestinians would be dead.

In other areas, such as nearby majority Muslim countries like Lebanon and Syria, yes, but then Israel could argue that they were being attacked as a nation, even more like 9/11 than the Oct 7th attack. They could use that as justification for strikes into those countries, since everyone let the US do it in Iraq and Afghanistan.

It just depends on how much they want to go for the military victory.