♥! :)

I have to make this nitpick:

“you” are the one keeping you on windows. You decide that those features are more important than any disadvantages.

Which I think is absolutely OK - that’s your choice. Many many people took this choice for a myriad of reasons and are the sum of “windows majority” - and no “I would change if” will perpetuate either feature development on Linux programs nor pressure on Microsoft.

Especially because the thread was dead your answer is highly appreciated!

What a clickbait thumbnail :/

That makes sense, thanks for the link! Will give it a read later :)

But it’s in the headline as well - that there should be a cause by the waves themselves - or perhaps I’m over reading the marketing side of science articles once more!

Can someone explain this part: “Such mergers are directly caused by gravitational waves.”.

I would’ve described it the prize way around, that only the merger of neuron stars provide enough gravitational energy to result in measurable gravitational waves - but this article claims that it’s the other way around…?

Could you please give a few insights into why bone over neo? I’ve used neo now for a few years, curious if it would be a fun extension to switch again!

You are the second person I got to meet in the wild using neo2.

The first one I met was myself 🤣 Although I have to admit it started out to just be different but I started loving it quite fast!

I’m just saying that I see that those two statements can exists at the same time without a huge mental leap - not that I agree with it - I apologize if I didn’t make that clear enough in the first post!

I read it like:

Mimic, pace of tone and body language are parts of the work.

That they don’t hit the main part (I.e the humor) is just the icing.

Perhaps I’m top lenient though.

That’s a huge today-I-learned for me, thank you! I took ill throw xeyes on it just to use ssh - C for the first time in my life. I actually assumed wrong.

I’ll edit my post accordingly!

(edit: here was wrong information - I apologize to the OP!)

Plus a GUI install is not exactly the best for reproducability which at least I aim for with my server infrastructure.

You’re not being dramatic enough - if you switch your point of view from user to creator. I’ll try to explain my point of view:

This is a hardware company just learning oppen software at best and there are a lot worse scenarios.

The homepage is an artificial loop. Correct me if I’m wrong but LAN mode wasn’t even fully functional on rollout.

They create awesome and exciting machines but that you point a critique of their closed system business practice as “overly dramatic” is interesting.

From my point of view notions like this will increase the split of the communities even further (makers VS users VS builders).

This doesn’t have to be a bad thing from my perspective nor is it the fault of Bambu - it’s just that individual people with their own focus will have a vastly different perception of how much intensity (aka drama) is appropriate.

What I intended to say is that it’s possible that you do care about their assumptions - more precisely how they behave based on their assumptions.

Because if that is the case than it could be worth the energy to train social reaction patterns (if that’s possible at all, excuse my lack of knowledge!)

The more you learn about your own reactions the better you know where to spend the very limited amount of emotional energy every person has - that’s the reason why I brought it up in the first place.

To put it in another way: assumptions and feelings are very closely related and exploring this connection could be time and energy well spent.

If you have a close person who knows you well you could ask them this question by the way - at least for me it’s sometimes easier to see patterns for others than within myself!

Yeah makes sense. I suggest though you check in on yourself with one part: “if not, their problem”

Hypothesis: If that’s the case you wouldn’t have created the OP.

This is intended purely as food for thought so - chances are high that I’m straight wrong. Still worth thinking about it in my opinion, just to be sure!

Great answers already!

Touching another point: when you hear “always” it could be literally about the frequency. Saying “I’m tired not this evening” will be perceived as a complaint when it’s the sixths night in a row for example.

The social clues are hard to spot I admit: often, “how are you” for example only has very few socially acceptable answers. That depends on your country and social environment though.

If you have a close friend within that group I recommend just asking them! Showing that you are conscious of their feedback will most likely be very well received.

I love that you’re learning and listening!

Good luck, friend :)

That point doesn’t matter in these jurisdictions (i.e. Western European ones I am aware of) . Confinement has two reasons and two only: rehabilitation and protection of the public. Revenge doesn’t have a place there. In my opinion rightfully so because the need for revenge is utterly subjective which laws need to avoid.

For example: I would see it as appropriate to nail this bastard on a wall by his balls. BUT I’m aware that this is mainly due to the publicity he got. How would I standardize ball nailing? How much would a shoplifter get? 1/4 of a testicle for half a day? And what would be the equivalent to criminals without scrotum?

But jokes aside: revenge can’t take place via public court. And I’m not informed about civil court mechanics in Norway.

Bonus: human rights apply to every single human. Each of them. And you can’t lose them. If that’s a good idea I’ll leave to each one to decide.

I get what you’re saying - from the article and your comment I couldn’t name the group of people that it discrimates against though.

Perhaps that’s a different legal blah blah but where I’m from you can only discrimate against a protected group of people (race, religion, disability, gender are the ones I am aware of).

Discrimination would be a tough sell - and a “you’re creating a divide” would likely be met with a “well discuss that with your supervisor, this is a decision based on individual and team circumstances” - which leads then to the issues described in the OP.

I would be delighted if someone could bring more efficient HR confronting arguments!