The outlet also has possible ties to the FSB.

But when it comes to the Special Military Operation™, they have good footage and their maps are useful.

It being a Russian outlet also means they provide a Russian view on the conflict, which is often ignored by western media.

But yes, you do have valid criticisms.

None of those are exclusive.

If it makes you feel better.

Just a pro-multipolar leftist, par for the course for .ml users, no?

There is a difference between institutionalized Nazis in Ukraine and extremist elements in the USA.

Ukraine’s Azov Battalion was made an official part of Ukraine’s Armed Forces and has become a premier unit in Ukraine’s military. This is despite their fascist ideology and their hand in the Christchurch mosque shootings.

Nazi Collaborator Stepan Bandera is treated as a national hero in Ukraine. Bandera’s birthday is a national holiday.

Interesting you talk about the US.

Far-Right extremists that conducted acts of violence in Charlottesville were trained by… Ukraine’s Azov Battalion.

Any land that is taken away from Nazi Ukraine is by definition, liberated.

So they mean the same thing!

Only the Ukronazis are allowed to abduct people apparently.

The shipbuilding industry in America has enough trouble trying to build frigates, I am not sure how Trump is going to get his ego-stroking battleships that no one in the Navy asked for.

:3

Russia who signed an non aggression agreement with Ukraine in 91 right?

I believe you meant the 1994 Budapest Memorandum. The Budapest Memorandum was first violated by America when they sanctioned Belarus in violation of Article 3 of the Memorandum.

America then stated that the Memorandum was “not legally binding”.

And by law, they cannot be used.

Conscripts are currently prohibited from serving outside the territory of the Russian Federation under any circumstances. Conscripts cannot even participate in peace-keeping missions.

Can you prove that conscripts are generally being used in Ukraine?

There are some cases where conscripts are used, where they signed combat contracts either voluntarily or without knowing what they signed or during the Kursk incursion. But these are exceptions, not the rule.

In 2022, there were some cases of conscripts being inadvertently or illegally deployed to Ukraine. However, when this was found out, they were withdrawn and returned to Russia. The commanding officers responsible for the deployments were punished.

Where are you getting this nonsense “most Russian soldiers are volunteers nonsense”

Putin has refused to send conscripts to the frontlines since Second Chechnya.

This has remained the case with even the Ukrainians admitting that the Russians generally rely on volunteers and have refused to send conscripts into Ukraine.

Now ain’t that the truth.

The plan never was ‘3 days’, that was an estimate that came from U.S General Mark Milley.

I have seen many sources that state that Ukraine is suffering from mass desertions:

Link

Link

Link

One should consider that Russia generally uses volunteers while Ukraine generally relies on conscripts.

Now you said that, you aren’t wrong.

Time to just wipe Russia off the map already, split the country up and give the land to the other surrounding nations.

Calm down, Mr Hitler.

Thanks for the additional information.