No, registers and bit-wise manipulation. In a Minecraft server running in the browser.

With enough zooming, even I can tell it’s the same profile picture. Wow.

Or “How Signal is closer in functionality to WhatsApp by the day, because it turns out people like the functionality of WhatsApp.”

Yeah, I’m all about Jetbrains in Night theme. Thanks for the alt text, by the way.

First it needs to work, then it needs to work well, and finally it may or may not work quickly. Along the way, it should also be humorously weird.

Why not ‘i’?

I decided to be wrong because the correct joke would be too convoluted. I’ll work on that implementation and then you can inject it at runtime via reflection.

Would you like a snake to replace your camel?

Self-documenting code, high contrast… Carry on.

I don’t know, at least ‘SetPerformance()’ could throw an argument out of bounds exception.

Perfect! Don’t forget to assert the same exception in all the tests.

I smell a NotImplementedException somewhere.

I was thinking about how this would happen and I remembered when signing up for services using Google login, I’d always get a list of information the website would have access to, including the name listed under the Google account. When I didn’t consent to that, I went back.

Now, is there a line somewhere between strictly getting a user’s consent and the user having an expectation of privacy? Yes, and they may have landed on the wrong side of it.

Suffice it to say, this is one of the reasons I prefer to sign up with an email address.

Risks that are already described.

The headline does it’s job getting clicks by making it sound like reviewers names may already be public.

I’m looking at it from a perspective of intentionality. Careless? Definitely. A risk ? For sure. But the situation is still not as the title implies.

If I’m reading this correctly, they’re adding your name to your site profile, but that’s not visible and is not linked to your reviews.

That specificity makes the situation much less terrifying than the title alone would imply.

Hey, you can cross-post this to rblind.com!

But the only way to make a single is to split a double. It just can’t be done.

Every time I go into the office we take like 5 coffee breaks throughout the day. Some coworkers have switched from pods to espresso machines to bring down the cost per cup.

Is it just my team? I feel like this is pretty common.

I’m gonna go find an SRE to hug, it sounds like they need it.