

can you make a 3d printed battery that never needs replacing? or are you counting on planned obsolescence?


can you make a 3d printed battery that never needs replacing? or are you counting on planned obsolescence?
I think the issue is most people don’t understand what an LLM is doing. It’s not thinking about your question and finding the right answer. It is just doing a bunch of math to calculate the most probable response based on all it’s training plus or minus some minor random variation. If your question could be answered by a thorough Google search then an llm can probably give you a good answer. If it’s about something you’re not going to find on the internet then the LLM will just make up something that sounds convincing. And that’s the problem. It may sound convincing but it’s a con man.

CO2 has never been a bottleneck for plant growth. It’s always been bioavailable nitrogen. This has nothing to do with climate science. If you got this wrong it’s because you’re a gullible fool.

Meanwhile we are standing up new fossil fuel plants to power AI and writing government contracts to buy more coal.
“Greenhouse gas measurements are like skidding into a car crash. The disaster gets closer and closer but you can’t stop it, you can clearly see the crash ahead, and all you can do is howl.”

Short version, a lot of forests near oceans are dying because of rising sea levels. Intrusion of saltwater is the biggest reason for the dying trees, though “drought, pests, and storms” also contribute.
An actual email sent by my company. (not representative of their usual)