

There is irony in making someone with your name explain themselves
There is irony in making someone with your name explain themselves
Since when is it illegal to sell tritium in the US? Gun companies selling tritium glow in the dark sights all the time.
I’ve personally seen court issued documents set to expire the day they were issued (they were meant to last a year). I’ve seen the issued date field empty. I’ve also seen them issued per the court’s website but unsigned.
Mistakes happen. If looking for a clerical error gets you off the hook that’s a good thing.
This logic works well until someone stumbles along with the opinion that QuantumSpecter is a racist bigot and a clenched fist.
Or what?
I was under the impression that it was more so a satire than a parody, which have less protection. (Key difference being one is a commentary other topics vs being a commentary on the original works) Then again I haven’t watched the full 60 minute video.
Imagine if someone made a video of your deceased father with “I’m Glad I’m Dead” in the title where his voice espouses political stances you or him quite probably disagree with.
It’s a worse precedent to set the inversion. Imagine a world where once you die mega corps get to use your likeness to advertise rewriting any legacy you might have had into being “the McDonalds guy”.
In June 2023, he said of one drug gang that had abducted 14 police officers: “I’m going to tell on you to your fathers and grandfathers,” suggesting they should get a good spanking.
Didn’t expect to read that in an AP article.
Fair use is a four factor test amount used is a factor but a low amount being used doesn’t strictly mean something is fair use. You could use a single frame of a movie and have it not qualify as fair use.
Not sure the CCP has a moral high ground on this issue.
Just now realizing for the first time slrpk.net doesn’t stand for “slurp k . net”
Reddit seems like a prime target to short IMO. Not even as a screw Reddit move. I just would never consider investing in them in their current state. Going public was a terrible choice for them.
Fixed thanks!
I’ve heard good things about the LAMY. Do you find it’s as practical for daily use as say a ballpoint?
There’s IP lawyers that do contingency work on patent enforcement for this reason.
To add to point 4 in small municipalities it’s not uncommon that the dispatcher might also serve other roles like a notary or permit processor who have to be accessible to the department or the public.
For some reason the article won’t load for me. But I’m guessing it talking about the claim only ~9% of the time officers were able to confirm a firearm was present on the scene.
The federal rule of procedure don’t allow such broad sweeping remedies that apply upon parties not before the courts.