- 11 Posts
- 15 Comments
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Fediverse@lemmy.world•[@fediverse](https://lemmy.world/c/fediverse) Is this a title ?English6·1 year agoHello from Lemmy! Can you see this or do I need to @ you?
And we see the post, but I don’t think it has a title.
Eta: @uhrbaan@mastodon.social?
Edit2: it’s a title now!
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Fediverse@lemmy.world•The free fediverses should focus on consent (including consent-based federation), privacy, and safetyEnglish3·1 year agoThat sounds like it punishes small instances… a lot. What would starting an instance look like? Do you start with a huge list of servers to inspect and approve?
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Fediverse@lemmy.world•The free fediverses should focus on consent (including consent-based federation), privacy, and safetyEnglish1·1 year agoTbh I’m struggling to imagine what this would look like in something like Lemmy. It seems to be describing an extreme form of setting your account to private, but this only really makes sense in a situation where you have followers who are friends and family. How would I decide who to “approve”?
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy MAUs climbing back up! You love to see it.English2·1 year agoOh you’re right, I read that as 490,000, sorry. Thanks
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy MAUs climbing back up! You love to see it.English1·1 year agoOK, but what arithmetic?
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy MAUs climbing back up! You love to see it.English1·1 year agoWhere did those numbers come from? MAU/users ismore like 25%?
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Technology@lemmy.world•Substack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi contentEnglish61·1 year agoThat’s the part that gets me. If it were just not removing content, well, I’d probably still complain but they’d have a coherent freedom of speech argument. But… they have to pay Nazis to make Nazi content and take a cut, otherwise it’s censorship and that somehow helps the Nazis?
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Technology@lemmy.world•41% of fediverse instances have blocked threads so far!!!English1·1 year agoWell, you’re commenting on a Mastodon post…
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Idea for future corporations trying to federateEnglish2·1 year agoI think these are great rules, so long as they never have any teeth.
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Fediverse@lemmy.world•2023 in social media: the case for the fediverseEnglish3·1 year agoThat’s really the entire article. “Yeah, for now its run by hippies who care about privacy and run servers out of a sense of civic duty, but we can fix that”
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Fediverse@lemmy.world•A take on an "ideal" fediverseEnglish2·1 year agoI mean, they’re doable, but they’re cultural goals, not technical ones.
I’d argue that really all of these are on a spectrum between the two though.
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialto Technology@lemmy.world•Elon Musk’s Grok Twitter AI Is Actually ‘Woke,’ Hilarity EnsuesEnglish29·1 year agoAgree with the first half, but unless I’m misunderstanding the type of AI being used, it really shouldn’t make a difference how logically soud they are? It cares more about vibes and rhetoric then logic, besides I guess using words consistently
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialtoTechnology@midwest.social•Elon Musk blames ADL for lost revenue, says he's 'against anti-Semitism of any kind'English7·2 years agoFor me the most shocking part is that he’s willing to admit Twitter lost so much value. I thought he was still on the “it’s finally turning a profit thanks to my brilliant leadership” train.
CrayonMaster@midwest.socialtomain@midwest.social•Post Karma Does Matter on Lemmy, use your votes accordingly.English1·2 years agoI think getting rid of downvotes can also make social media more negative, since people feel the need to reply to things they don’t like instead of down voting and moving on. Of course, I now can’t find a source to back that claim, so take it with a grain of salt.
No, Gen z covers people as young as 11 or 12, which is a good guess for “kids on Instagram”