Sure but that didn’t save you from skype either, i guess :'-/

Ok i see someone of us needs a refresher on the concept of invention

Exactly. Believe it or not, someone invented that word at some point in history. And it wasn’t google.

Also it’s not really a brand, it’s just a fucking letter of the alphabet. It shouldn’t be possible to trademark letters of the alphabet. Basic decency, people

Msn messenger was perfectly fine, until people left me alone on there to join bloody skype

Yeah well let’s start checking it real quick

what kind of logic is that? A small victory is better than no victory

I see that the deadline for skynet in 2029 is more realistic every day

Let me mansplain this.

There are 2 main ways to alter the way llms like chatgpt respond: 1) training & fine-tuning and 2) prompting.

Prompting means feeding the LLM information in the form of text, so it has actual stuff in what you could call its “short-term memory”. That can be done interactively and only allows you to feed it a limited number of words.

Training and tuning are much slower processes and are used to build up and refine the “long-term” memory and to give importance and detail to specific topics, or to reinforce some kind of trait, like tone or type of answers it can produce.

I’m pretty sure what ibm and nasa did was a round of fine-tuning with material in that area of knowledge, not just prompting.

Lol apparently judges are selected for low iq as well

IE sucked since the beginning, that’s not the reason it died.

Lol sure. First of all “lobby” is a very transparent euphemism for “bribe”. In second place the lack of proper rules in the US is creating behemoths that are very difficult to deal wIth. These companies are richer than nations and will be impossible to contain.

You are right, we should tax capital gains drastically so to disincentivise speculation, and force investor to rely on dividends. This would put a stop on the crazy run for growth we are experiencing as companies try to make their market valuation go up in this unsustainable eternal race to the top.

Good metaphor, and their argument is “but we are also paying the gasoline”. Still sounds like slavery with extra steps.

“Their” is the keyword here, they think they own the users

I’m sure there would be workaounds to that, also I’m not selling anything, just sharing a project and list of components. i’m not a lawyer but i’m pretty sure there’s nothing they can do to stop me

Even if what you said was true, i think the better choice would be to go in the direction of simplicity, not the direction that favours segregation.

I think it’s time for an open source 2d printer project, we have open source 3d printers and the technology is much more complex than 2d. Time to put HP to sleep

So it’s not so easy to implement after all

How comes I never saw that implemented, then? Progressive taxation stops “progressing” at around the 100k threshold and that’s basically just a decent salary. The Rich are never really affected by it.

Carbon credits would be a way to level the ground in some situations and could give you a right to say NO to people consuming more than their share, or at least account for externalities and get paid if you allow them to use your “quota”.