- 1 Post
- 191 Comments
142·1 year agoWhat ads?
Have you actually used Windows?
I’ll help also
I’m predicting a class action with Canadian Tire.
Thanks for that read. I definitely agree with the author for the most part. I don’t really agree that current LLMs are a form of AGI, but it’s definitely close.
But what isn’t up for debate is the fact that LLMs are 100% AI. There’s no debate there. But I think the reason why people argue that is because they conflate “intelligence” with concepts like sapience, sentience, consciousness, etc.
These people don’t understand that intelligence is a concept that can, and does, exist outside of consciousness.
The most infuriating thing for me is the constant barrage of “LLMs aren’t AI” from people.
These people have no understanding of what they’re talking about.
Edit: to everyone down voting me, look at this image
I found this “no longer listed” items on eBay
During an annular eclipse this is true. But during the totality phase of a total solar eclipse, the entire sun is being blocked (UV doesn’t magically travel through the moon).
An annular eclipse is when the moon is the furthest away from Earth. A total eclipse is when the moon is close enough that the angular size of the moon is larger than the sun. So all light is blocked for a couple minutes. The few moments right before and right after totality are the most dangerous because most of the sun is covered and it doesn’t hurt the eyes, but can still be damaging.
I’d watch out for anything safety related on Amazon. They’ve been found selling fake smoke/CO2/CO alarms, fuses that blow at more than twice their rating, and in 2017 they did a major recall on their solar eclipse glasses.
And is the photo/video generator completely on home machines without any processing being done remotely already?
Yes
As soon as anyone can do this on their own machine with no third parties involved
We’ve been there for a while now
FR is not generative AI, and people need to stop crying about FR being the boogieman. The harm that FR can potentially cause has been covered and surpassed by other forms of monitoring, primarily smartphone and online tracking.
But I don’t see how you can make the customer go for a ride if the customer doesn’t want to go for a ride.
Don’t hand over the keys on the basis that company requirements for liability mitigation were not met.
I know that sounds like a stretch, but Tesla buyers don’t own their cars. Tesla has control over the system (OTA updates), you “have to” bring it to Tesla for repairs and service, and they’ve even tried to control who can resell a cyberteuck.
You’re basically renting a Tesla at full price.
they literally have no mechanism to do any of those things.
What mechanism does it have for pattern recognition?
that is literally how it works on a coding level.
Neural networks aren’t “coded”.
It’s called an LLM for a reason.
That doesn’t mean what you think it does. Another word for language is communication. So you could just as easily call it a Large Communication Model.
Neural networks have hundreds of thousands (at the minimum) of interconnected
layersneurons. Llama-2 has 76 billion parameters. The newly released Grok has over 300 billion. And though we don’t have official numbers, ChatGPT 4 is said to be close to a trillion.The interesting thing is that when you have neural networks of such a size and you feed large amounts of data into it, emergent properties start to show up. More than just “predicting the next word”, it starts to develop a relational understanding of certain words that you wouldn’t expect. It’s been shown that LLMs understand things like Miami and Houston are closer together than New York and Paris.
Those kinds of things aren’t programmed, they are emergent from the dataset.
As for things like creativity, they are absolutely creative. I have asked seemingly impossible questions (like a Harlequin story about the Terminator and Rambo) and the stuff it came up with was actually astounding.
They regularly use tools. Lang Chain is a thing. There’s a new LLM called Devin that can program, look up docs online, and use a command line terminal. That’s using a tool.
That also ties in with problem solving. Problem solving is actually one of the benchmarks that researchers use to evaluate LLMs. So they do problem solving.
To problem solve requires the ability to do analysis. So that check mark is ticked off too.
Just about anything that’s a neutral network can be called an AI, because the total is usually greater than the sum of its parts.
Edit: I wrote interconnected layers when I meant neurons
LLMs as AI is just a marketing term. there’s nothing “intelligent” about “AI”
Yes there is. You just mean it doesn’t have “high” intelligence. Or maybe you mean to say that there’s nothing sentient or sapient about LLMs.
Some aspects of intelligence are:
- Planning
- Creativity
- Use of tools
- Problem solving
- Pattern recognition
- Analysts
LLMs definitely hit basically all of these points.
Most people have been told that LLMs “simply” provide a result by predicting the next word that’s most likely to come next, but this is a completely reductionist explaining and isn’t the whole picture.
Edit: yes I did leave out things like “understanding”, "abstract thinking ", and “innovation”.
I can see that you don’t care about regulating the industry.
Right, because me saying that Facebook and other social media selling our data even just for advertising is not ok and we should introduce laws for strong data and privacy protection equates to me “not caring about regulating the industry”.
Sure there, bud.
You just want to punish China.
Nonsense.
But it’s a law that targets a single person or organization. And the Constitution outright bans it.
Ok, I get this, but it gets murky when the “organisation” being targeted is a corporate office of a government party.
I’m not claiming to have the answer, but as a non-American I can’t get upset at such a bill. Simply because it would push back against a country that lately had been getting away with everything and causing severe and deliberate harm in other countries, including mine and yours.
Facebook being sued for giving data to Chinese companies with tighter relationships to the CCP than Bytedance is literally headline news right now.
I looked it up, and you’re right that there’s an issue there. But that’s an issue with an American owned company giving data to an adversarial country (two actually, China and Russia). It’s 100% absurd and shouldn’t be allowed with heavy penalties. But that’s still a different issue than the one we’re talking about.
The fact is you’re bending over backwards to defend an unconstitutional law with unprecedented powers
Two things: I’m not American, and it’s not unconstitutional anyways. There’s nothing in the bill that says no one is allowed to use it. And the first and preferred option of the bill is to sell ownership of TikTok to an American firm, essentially to divorce control and influence of China from the largely American userbase. If, and only if, the transfer of ownership is not possible then the app is to be delisted from all app stores.
That means that it’s still possible for existing users to use the app and it’s still possible to install the app through official means without either thing being illegal.
Another interesting thing is that the Chinese Foreign Ministry has said it will protect its rights and national security interests (paraphrased). What on earth does TikTok, an app that’s Chinese owned and banned in the very country that owns it, have to do with Chinese National security?
That a very telling thing to say.
Make it illegal on pain of ban to give, or sell American data to a sensitive country; or otherwise cause American data in your company’s control to come into their possession.
I can agree with this, but the TikTok bill has nothing to do with xenophobia. If China wasn’t an adversarial country actively bullying and threatening other countries with war and annihilation then it wouldn’t be an issue.
In fact, let’s go a step further and implement sweeping data protection laws so that our data can’t be sold for any reason.
The question of what’s the difference isn’t some cute gotcha thing.
No, it’s not a “cute gotcha thing”. It’s pointing out the difference between passive data collection and active control to influence content.
And you need to look up targeted advertising.
I know very well what it is. I work in the tech sector (IT/programming) adjacent to cyber security.
It’s literally creating a custom algorithm on everything from Reddit to Facebook to Google Search. Which is why it was used by the Russians to impact our 2016 elections via Facebook.
Right, so if you think targeted advertising is bad when company A sells data to company B, who then builds algorithms to target people for political party C, imagine how bad it is when that entire process is vertically integrated and directly controlled by a foreign adversary. And to add to that, we’re not even just dealing with ads anymore, we’re dealing with grassroots-like influencer content with talking points from the CCP.
You gave me an example of one really bad thing and said it’s the same thing as a different and extremely bad thing.
Both of them are bad need to be addressed. But with TikTok being run by a CCP-influenced company in a country that laughs at American laws, there’s little recourse to deal with it.
If that needs to be spelled out to you, then that explains your position.
You’re either not too smart to understand, or you’re a tankie of some kind.
You also completely dodged the part where you need to backup your claims about Facebook selling data to China.
I’ll bring the snacks!