They can both suck an egg.

Self-censorship is the best censorship

Completely legal and definitely not abusing one monopoly to push for another

FINALLY!!!

More like charge money to be called a verified user without actually being verified.

Exactly. With youtube’s shitty tutorial search functions ever since they removed dislikes, i kinda need to see the start of the video to know if its even relevant. But no. Full on 2-3 pre-video ads.

It is, but thats the compromise - less reliability for more comfort. Its not “stupid”, its just a compromise.

ChatGPT is more concise, something wikipedia doesnt excel at by design.

While i agree with them, i do think Microsoft is attempting even worse steps in turning bing/edge into the next google: literally cant open windows help links on any other browser, the task bar’s search functions are bing only, popups about using edge instead of chrome, defaulting 100 file types into edge.

Those big companiew are shit. They all attempt the same stuff while blaming others for succeeding in doing so.

Dude ms defender used to delete my “Hello World” executables built using visual studio just because they were made by an unknown publisher.

Its just a simple example of cause and effect. I am not denying climate change, i just saw no explanation in the article about which parts of climate change diectly contributed to this, which felt very missing considering its in the abstract. This is all i am saying.

Your explanation is true, but i just wanted the details.

Probably does - but it was disappointing the article did not give any expert’s explanation on the matter. Why is it so wrong to state that those details are missing from the article?

A phenomenon that causes climate change is not necessarily caused by climate change. If i burn a forest down it would increase climate change, but the cause is me burning down a forest.

No its not. And im not denying climate change or anything.

This is a phenomenon that increases climate change, but i saw nothing in the article suggesting this slowdown of the stream was caused by climate change.

For example, if i start a forest fire and a ton of trees are burned, this will increase climate change, but this theoretical forest fire wouldnt have been caused BY climate change - it would have been caused by me.

The abstract strongly suggests “climate change is likely responsible”, but i saw nothing in the article supporting that. Maybe i just missed it, but i was quite disappointed.

So no real evidence this is connected to caused by climate change huh?

Finally someone is fighting those companies that take advantage of controlling the platforms.

So i tried this one and for some reason i cant find candy crush in my start menu. What did i do wrong?

And I am certain the terms will be clear and concise, definitely less than 50 pages and no vague and contradicting statements all over.

I have a strong feeling the terms of usage for this opt-in will include something along the lines of “we can use your voice for our future projects” and then in a few years they will just create podcasts using podcasters’ voices without their true consent and make a ton off their backs while increasing their competition.

Pixel phones are not saints either. They keep pushing google products/servicea down your throat.

Good. Keep cluttering the app until people move to simpler alternatives. Preferably libre.