The post title is hugely overstating the study: one country’s laptop-oriented program didn’t help academic performance for first adopters.

Oh boy. I can’t wait for these new features to come to the new iPhone™ 17 Pro Max. It’s incredible how Apple Inc. continues to push boundaries and bring people together!

allegedly

While actively discussing mass shootings.

To further clarify, his big PB-scale servers are for hosting their archive of raw footage.

Alternative plan: do the same with unattended freight cars for pennies on the dollar.

XeXuriXy

Seriously?

What idiot thought it would take a trillion years for the US to rack up $37 in debt?

If you actually clicked through, you’d realize this reads as “gee, why does this klansman listen to so much rap?”

Ostensibly, a noble goal. Practice is a bit more fuzzy.

Also: nothing is ever new

Or if this was targeted at virtually any other category of people

Inb4 “found the bear”

Entirely false

Yeah, only wackjobs think the Catholic church committed genocide in Canada.

Today’s septic tank full of dead babies is brought to you by RAID: SHADOW LEGENDS!

Inb4 hot takes that are especially relevant in June.

It’s an old story. The age range determination was like 2014, the big headline for genetic testing was done in like 2018.

Your DNA sequence is generally pretty stable, but other characteristics do. Epigenetics is the field. Another example is methylation, which is basically like your cell putting a post-it note that says “don’t use this” on a particular region. By looking at a bunch of different methylation sites an age can be estimated.

But in this case, it appears that the article is just mixing up “genetic testing was performed” and “the ages were determined” (separate statements from previous articles.)

I spent about five minutes telling and subsequently explaining this joke to my wife. 10/10.

Oddly enough… It’s pretty similar.