• shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    That sounds like a fantastic way to go. You might also look at meshtastic.

    It’s a much different use case, being for text messaging and stuff like that only. But, while it may be low bandwidth, it’s still incredibly interesting.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      https://reticulum.network/ is also pretty good for small info packets. Does a LOT more than meshtastic…but its VERY difficult to set up. Or at least it was for me.

      Its a pipe dream but having small internet without a major ISP would be fantastic. But it will never happen as it is. Friends are thinking of creating a meshnet though just for fun.

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, the bandwidth would be the damper there. It’s great for transmitting just a little bit of data, long distances. But for any sort of bigger data we transmit regularly on phones and desktop. It becomes unfeasible, even low resolution images.It definitely has a range benefit, though that’s for sure.I think fellow Missourian Jeff Geerling had a video out a while back where he talked about using it to contact people below his flight on the way to open sauce.

    • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I jumped on Meshtastic but found it got too congested with noise in a medium-sized city making it difficult to get much out there. Switched to Meshcore and have had a much better time communicating. Seattle’s full on made it equivalent to SMS, which makes me jealous. But YMMV 🤷🏼‍♂️